Effectiveness of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in a Clinical Care Environment
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) is effective in the management of type 1 diabetes when implemented in a manner that more closely approximates clinical practice. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: After completion of a 6-month randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluating CGM in children, adolescents, and adults with type 1 diabetes, CGM was initiated in the trial's control group with less intensive training and follow-up than was included in the RCT. Subjects had an outpatient training session, two follow-up phone calls, and outpatient visits at 1, 4, 13, and 26 weeks. For subjects with baseline A1C ≥7.0%, the primary outcome was change in A1C at 6 months. RESULTS: CGM use decreased from a median of 7.0 days/week in the first month in the ≥25-year-old group, 6.3 days/week in the 15–24 year olds, and 6.8 days/week in the 8–14 year olds to 6.5, 3.3, and 3.7 days/week in the 6th month, respectively (P < 0.001 for each age-group). Among subjects with baseline A1C ≥7.0%, CGM use was associated with A1C reduction after 6 months (P = 0.02 adjusted for age-group). Severe hypoglycemia decreased from 27.7 events per 100 person-years in the 6-month control phase of the RCT to 15.0 events per 100 person-years in the 6-month follow-up CGM phase (P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Frequent use of CGM in a clinical care setting may improve A1C and reduce episodes of hypoglycemia. However, sustained frequent use of CGM is less likely in children and adolescents than in adults.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In a JDRF-funded CGM trial among children and adults with type 1 diabetes and A1c ≥7.0% at enrollment, a significant reduction in A1c was observed in adults aged 25 years or older but not in participants aged 5-14 or 15-24 years when CGM users were compared with controls.
“Among children and adults with T1D with a A1c ≥ 7.0% at enrollment in the study, a significant reduction in A1c was observed in adults (≥ 25 years) but not in participants 5–14 years or 15–24 years when subjects assigned to the CGM use were compared to the controls95.”
From Epidemiology of type 1 diabetes (2010) · cites this paper as [95]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 14 · Cited by 313
- Authors
- Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group
- Affiliations
- Breakthrough T1D (US)
- Corresponding author
- Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2009-10-16
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 17-22
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- PMC
- PMC2797966
- OpenAlex
- W2169378095
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 11.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- continuous glucose monitoring, type 1 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, hypoglycemia, patient training, children and adolescents, adults, real-world clinical practice
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Blood Glucose, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review