Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of high-dose human regular U-500 insulin versus human regular U-100 insulin in healthy obese subjects
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Human regular U-500 (U-500R) insulin (500 units/mL) is increasingly being used clinically, yet its pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) have not been well studied. Therefore, we compared PK and PD of clinically relevant doses of U-500R with the same doses of human regular U-100 (U-100R) insulin (100 units/mL). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a single-site, randomized, double-blind, crossover euglycemic clamp study. Single subcutaneous injections of 50- and 100-unit doses of U-500R and U-100R were administered to 24 healthy obese subjects. RESULTS: Both overall insulin exposure (area under the serum insulin concentration versus time curve from zero to return to baseline [AUC(0-)(t)(')]) and overall effect (total glucose infused during a clamp) were similar between formulations at both 50- and 100-unit doses (90% [CI] of ratios contained within [0.80, 1.25]). However, peak concentration and effect were significantly lower for U-500R at both doses (P < 0.05). Both formulations produced relatively long durations of action (18.3 to 21.5 h). Time-to-peak concentration and time to maximum effect were significantly longer for U-500R than U-100R at the 100-unit dose (P < 0.05). Time variables reflective of duration of action (late tR(max50), tR(last)) were prolonged for U-500R versus U-100R at both doses (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Overall exposure to and action of U-500R insulin after subcutaneous injection were no different from those of U-100R insulin. For U-500R, peaks of concentration and action profiles were blunted and the effect after the peak was prolonged. These findings may help guide therapy with U-500R insulin for highly insulin-resistant patients with diabetes.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
U-500 regular insulin has similar onset but a delayed, blunted, and prolonged peak effect and longer duration of action compared with U-100 regular insulin.
“U-500 regular insulin has distinct pharmacokinetics with similar onset but a delayed, blunted, and prolonged peak effect and longer duration of action compared with U-100 regular insulin; thus, it has characteristics more like a premixed intermediate-acting (NPH) and regular insulin product and can be used as two or three daily injections (177,178).”
From 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [177]
The Results report similar onset, lower peak effect, and prolonged duration for U-500R versus U-100R. However, the Abstract Results and Conclusions specify that time to maximum effect was significantly delayed only at the 100-unit dose; the claim presents that delay without the dose qualification. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredU-500 regular insulin has characteristics more like a premixed intermediate-acting (NPH) and regular insulin product.
“U-500 regular insulin has distinct pharmacokinetics with similar onset but a delayed, blunted, and prolonged peak effect and longer duration of action compared with U-100 regular insulin; thus, it has characteristics more like a premixed intermediate-acting (NPH) and regular insulin product and can be used as two or three daily injections (177,178).”
From 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [177]
The Conclusions (page unavailable) report a similar onset to U-100 regular insulin and a longer duration of action, which the authors say may permit multiple daily injections without basal insulin. Those findings support the short- and longer-acting aspects of the analogy, but the paper does not compare U-500 with an NPH/regular premix or state that their characteristics are alike. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- [2]Knee TS Seidensticker DF Walton JL Solberg LM Lasseter DH A novel use of U-500 insulin for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in patients with insulin resistance: a case series. Endocr Pract 2003; 9: 181– 186 12917058
- [3]Cochran E Musso C Gorden P The use of U-500 in patients with extreme insulin resistance. Diabetes Care 2005; 28: 1240– 1244 15855601
- [4]Ballani P Tran MT Navar MD Davidson MB Clinical experience with U-500 regular insulin in obese, markedly insulin-resistant type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 2504– 2505 17065692
- [5]Lane WS Cochran EK Jackson JA High-dose insulin therapy: is it time for U-500 insulin? Endocr Pract 2009; 15: 71– 79 19211405
- [6]Dailey AM Williams S Taneja D Tannock LR Clinical efficacy and patient satisfaction with U-500 insulin use. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2010; 88: 259– 264 20226557 PMC4560266
- [7]Davidson MB Navar MD Echeverry D Duran P U-500 regular insulin: clinical experience and pharmacokinetics in obese, severely insulin-resistant type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 281– 283 19910500 PMC2809265
- [8]Lane WS Weinrib SL Rappaport JM Przestrzelski T A prospective trial of U500 insulin delivered by Omnipod in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and severe insulin resistance. Endocr Pract 2010; 16: 778– 784 20350913
- [11]American Diabetes Association Standards of medical care in diabetes—2010. Diabetes Care 2010; 33(Suppl. 1): S11– S61 20042772 PMC2797382
- [13]Binder C Lauritzen T Faber O Pramming S Insulin pharmacokinetics. Diabetes Care 1984; 7: 188– 199 6376015
- [14]Jørgensen KH Hansen AK Buschard K Five fold increase of insulin concentration delays the absorption of subcutaneously injected human insulin suspensions in pigs. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2000; 50: 161– 167 11106830
- [15]Galloway JA Spradlin CT Nelson RL Wentworth SM Davidson JA Swarner JL Factors influencing the absorption, serum insulin concentration, and blood glucose responses after injections of regular insulin and various insulin mixtures. Diabetes Care 1981; 4: 366– 376 7047113
- [16]Binder C Absorption of injected insulin. A clinical-pharmacological study. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh) 1969; 27(Suppl. 2): 1– 84 4908935
- [17]Hildebrandt P Sestoft L Nielsen SL The absorption of subcutaneously injected short-acting soluble insulin: influence of injection technique and concentration. Diabetes Care 1983; 6: 459– 462 6400706
- [18]Trajanoski Z Wach P Kotanko P Ott A Skraba F Pharmacokinetic model for the absorption of subcutaneously injected soluble insulin and monomeric insulin analogues. Biomed Tech (Berl) 1993; 38: 224– 231 8218870
- [20]Klein O Lynge J Endahl L Damholt B Nosek L Heise T Albumin-bound basal insulin analogues (insulin detemir and NN344): comparable time-action profiles but less variability than insulin glargine in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2007; 9: 290– 299 17391154
- [21]Hompesch M Ocheltree SM Wondmagegnehu ET Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin lispro protamine suspension compared with insulin glargine and insulin detemir in type 2 diabetes. Curr Med Res Opin 2009; 25: 2679– 2687 19761358
- [22]Gagnon-Auger M du Souich P Baillargeon JP Dose-dependent delay of the hypoglycemic effect of short-acting insulin analogs in obese subjects with type 2 diabetes: a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 2502– 2507 20841613 PMC2992178
- [24]Cochran E Gorden P The use of U-500 insulin in the treatment of severe insulin resistance. Insulin 2008; 3: 211– 218
- [25]Segal AR Brunner JE Burch FT Jackson JA Use of concentrated insulin human regular (U-500) for patients with diabetes. Am J Health Syst Pharm 2010; 67: 1526– 1535 20811030
Cited by
Sorted by citations
9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, ElSayed, N. A., McCoy, R. G., Aleppo, G., Bajaj, M., Balapattabi, K., Beverly, E. A., Briggs Early, K., Bruemmer, D., Echouffo-Tcheugui, J. B., et al. (2025) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc25-s009 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
Insulin analogues in type 1 diabetes mellitus: Getting better all the time
Mathieu, C., Gillard, P., & Benhalima, K. (2017) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2017.39 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
The evolution of insulin and how it informs therapy and treatment choices
Hirsch, I. B., Juneja, R., Beals, J. M., Antalis, C. J., & Wright, E. E. (2020) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/endrev/bnaa015 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Management of diabetes mellitus in patients with chronic kidney disease
Hahr, A. J., & Molitch, M. E. (2015) · Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology · doi:10.1186/s40842-015-0001-9 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Clinical use of U-500 regular insulin: Review and meta-analysis
Reutrakul, S., Wroblewski, K., & Brown, R. L. (2012) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/193229681200600229 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
Hood, R. C., Arakaki, R. F., Wysham, C., Li, Y. G., Settles, J. A., & Jackson, J. A. (2015) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep15612.or · Cited by 61 · see citing works
Self-citationConcentrated insulins: Clinical update of therapeutic options
Umpierrez, G. E., Holt, E. H., Einhorn, D., & McGill, J. B. (2020) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep-2019-0607 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Management of severe insulin resistance in patients with type 1 diabetes
Schechter, R., & Reutrakul, S. (2015) · Current Diabetes Reports · doi:10.1007/s11892-015-0641-2 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- de la Peña, A., Riddle, M., Morrow, L. A., Jiang, H. H., Linnebjerg, H., Scott, A., Win, K. M., Hompesch, M., Mace, K. F., Jacobson, J. G., & Jackson, J. A.
- Affiliations
- Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana
- Oregon Health & Science University (US)
- Profil Institute for Clinical Research (US)
- Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
- Eli Lilly (United Kingdom) (GB)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2011-11-14
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2496-2501
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- PMC
- PMC3220843
- OpenAlex
- W2079259745
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 7.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2014-08-01)
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Keywords
- U-500 insulin, U-100 insulin, insulin pharmacokinetics, insulin pharmacodynamics, high-dose insulin, insulin duration of action, insulin resistance, obesity, euglycemic clamp, subcutaneous insulin injection, diabetes treatment
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Glucose Clamp Technique, Cross-Over Studies, Area Under Curve, Insulin, Regular, Human
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review