Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 381

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Risk in Type 2 Diabetes as Skeletal Complications of Inadequate Glucose Control

Open access
Oei, Ling, Zillikens, M. Carola, Dehghan, Abbas, Buitendijk, Gabriëlle H.S., Castaño-Betancourt, Martha C., Estrada, Karol, Stolk, Lisette, Oei, Edwin H.G., van Meurs, Joyce B.J., Janssen, Joseph A.M.J.L., Hofman, Albert, van Leeuwen, Johannes P.T.M., Witteman, Jacqueline C.M., Pols, Huibert A.P., Uitterlinden, André G., Klaver, Caroline C.W., Franco, Oscar H., Rivadeneira, Fernando·2013·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Individuals with type 2 diabetes have increased fracture risk despite higher bone mineral density (BMD). Our aim was to examine the influence of glucose control on skeletal complications. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data of 4,135 participants of the Rotterdam Study, a prospective population-based cohort, were available (mean follow-up 12.2 years). At baseline, 420 participants with type 2 diabetes were classified by glucose control (according to HbA1c calculated from fructosamine), resulting in three comparison groups: adequately controlled diabetes (ACD; n = 203; HbA1c <7.5%), inadequately controlled diabetes (ICD; n = 217; HbA1c ≥7.5%), and no diabetes (n = 3,715). Models adjusted for sex, age, height, and weight (and femoral neck BMD) were used to test for differences in bone parameters and fracture risk (hazard ratio [HR] [95% CI]). RESULTS: The ICD group had 1.1–5.6% higher BMD, 4.6–5.6% thicker cortices, and −1.2 to −1.8% narrower femoral necks than ACD and ND, respectively. Participants with ICD had 47–62% higher fracture risk than individuals without diabetes (HR 1.47 [1.12–1.92]) and ACD (1.62 [1.09–2.40]), whereas those with ACD had a risk similar to those without diabetes (0.91 [0.67–1.23]). CONCLUSIONS: Poor glycemic control in type 2 diabetes is associated with fracture risk, high BMD, and thicker femoral cortices in narrower bones. We postulate that fragility in apparently “strong” bones in ICD can result from microcrack accumulation and/or cortical porosity, reflecting impaired bone repair.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc12-1188

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 381

Metadata

Authors
Oei, L., Zillikens, M. C., Dehghan, A., Buitendijk, G. H. S., Castaño-Betancourt, M. C., Estrada, K., Stolk, L., Oei, E. H. G., van Meurs, J. B. J., Janssen, J. A. M. J. L., Hofman, A., van Leeuwen, J. P. T. M., Witteman, J. C. M., Pols, H. A. P., Uitterlinden, A. G., Klaver, C. C. W., Franco, O. H., & Rivadeneira, F.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2013-05-15
Volume
36
Issue
6
Pages
1619-1628
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2091042653
Cited by
381
References
2
FWCI
24.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Risk in Type 2 Diabetes as Skeletal Complications of Inadequate Glucose Control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/dc12-1188
The paper
Oei, L., Zillikens, M. C., Dehghan, A., Buitendijk, G. H. S., Castaño-Betancourt, M. C., Estrada, K., Stolk, L., Oei, E. H. G., van Meurs, J. B. J., Janssen, J. A. M. J. L., Hofman, A., van Leeuwen, J. P. T. M., Witteman, J. C. M., Pols, H. A. P., Uitterlinden, A. G., Klaver, C. C. W., Franco, O. H., & Rivadeneira, F. (2013). High Bone Mineral Density and Fracture Risk in Type 2 Diabetes as Skeletal Complications of Inadequate Glucose Control. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-1188

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.