Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 371

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Empagliflozin as Add-on to Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes

Open access
Häring, Hans-Ulrich, Merker, Ludwig, Seewaldt-Becker, Elke, Weimer, Marc, Meinicke, Thomas, Woerle, Hans J., Broedl, Uli C., on behalf of the EMPA-REG METSU Trial Investigators·2013·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the efficacy and tolerability of empagliflozin as add-on to metformin and sulfonylurea in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients inadequately controlled on metformin and sulfonylurea (HbA1c ≥7 to ≤10%) were randomized and treated with once-daily empagliflozin 10 mg (n = 225), empagliflozin 25 mg (n = 216), or placebo (n = 225) for 24 weeks. The primary end point was change from baseline in HbA1c at week 24. Key secondary end points were changes from baseline in weight and mean daily glucose (MDG) at week 24. RESULTS: At week 24, adjusted mean (SE) changes from baseline in HbA1c were −0.17% (0.05) for placebo vs. −0.82% (0.05) and −0.77% (0.05) for empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg, respectively (both P < 0.001). Empagliflozin significantly reduced MDG, weight, and systolic (but not diastolic) blood pressure versus placebo. Adverse events were reported in 62.7, 67.9, and 64.1% of patients on placebo and empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg, respectively. Events consistent with urinary tract infection were reported in 8.0, 10.3, and 8.3% of patients on placebo and empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg, respectively (females: 13.3, 18.0, and 17.5%, respectively; males: 2.7, 2.7, and 0%, respectively). Events consistent with genital infection were reported in 0.9, 2.7, and 2.3% of patients on placebo and empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg, respectively (females: 0.9, 4.5, and 3.9%, respectively; males: 0.9% in each group). CONCLUSIONS: Empagliflozin 10 and 25 mg for 24 weeks as add-on to metformin plus sulfonylurea improved glycemic control, weight, and systolic blood pressure and were well tolerated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc12-2673

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 34 references

Cited by

See all 371

Metadata

Authors
Häring, H.-U., Merker, L., Seewaldt-Becker, E., Weimer, M., Meinicke, T., Woerle, H. J., Broedl, U. C., & on behalf of the EMPA-REG METSU Trial Investigators
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2013-10-15
Volume
36
Issue
11
Pages
3396-3404
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2171471305
Cited by
371
References
34
FWCI
38.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Empagliflozin as Add-on to Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/dc12-2673
The paper
Häring, H.-U., Merker, L., Seewaldt-Becker, E., Weimer, M., Meinicke, T., Woerle, H. J., Broedl, U. C., & on behalf of the EMPA-REG METSU Trial Investigators. (2013). Empagliflozin as Add-on to Metformin Plus Sulfonylurea in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc12-2673

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.