Cited by 130Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients

Hospital discharge algorithm based on admission HbA1c for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes

Open access
Umpierrez, Guillermo E., Reyes, David, Smiley, Dawn, Hermayer, Kathie, Khan, Amna, Olson, Darin E., Pasquel, Francisco, Jacobs, Sol +3 more·2014·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Effective treatment algorithms are needed to guide diabetes care at hospital discharge in general medicine and surgery patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter open-label study aimed to determine the safety and efficacy of a hospital discharge algorithm based on admission HbA1c. Patients with HbA1c <7% (53.0 mmol/mol) were discharged on their preadmission diabetes therapy, HbA1c between 7 and 9% (53.0–74.9 mmol/mol) were discharged on a preadmission regimen plus glargine at 50% of hospital daily dose, and HbA1c >9% were discharged on oral antidiabetes agents (OADs) plus glargine or basal bolus regimen at 80% of inpatient dose. The primary outcome was HbA1c concentration at 12 weeks after hospital discharge. RESULTS: A total of 224 patients were discharged on OAD (36%), combination of OAD and glargine (27%), basal bolus (24%), glargine alone (9%), and diet (4%). The admission HbA1c was 8.7 ± 2.5% (71.6 mmol/mol) and decreased to 7.3 ± 1.5% (56 mmol/mol) at 12 weeks of follow-up (P < 0.001). The change of HbA1c from baseline at 12 weeks after discharge was −0.1 ± 0.6, −0.8 ± 1.0, and −3.2 ± 2.4 in patients with HbA1c <7%, 7–9%, and >9%, respectively (P < 0.001). Hypoglycemia (<70 mg/dL) was reported in 22% of patients discharged on OAD only, 30% on OAD plus glargine, 44% on basal bolus, and 25% on glargine alone and was similar in patients with admission HbA1c ≤7% (26%) compared with those with HbA1c >7% (31%, P = 0.54). CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of HbA1c on admission is beneficial in tailoring treatment regimens at discharge in general medicine and surgery patients with type 2 diabetes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc14-0479

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inpatient treatment and discharge planning are more effective when preadmission glycemia is considered.

    “because inpatient treatment and discharge planning are more effective when preadmission glycemia is considered”

    From 16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [4]

    The Conclusions (page not specified in our copy) say that admission HbA1c helped tailor treatment at discharge and that the discharge algorithm improved HbA1c over 12 weeks. The study does not show that considering preadmission glycemia made treatment during the hospital stay more effective, nor does it compare discharge planning with and without that information. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The discharge algorithm significantly improved A1C after discharge.

    “and significantly improved A1C after discharge (4).”
  • A discharge algorithm for glycemic medication adjustment based on admission A1C, diabetes medications before admission, and insulin usage during hospitalization was found useful to guide treatment decisions.

    “A discharge algorithm for glycemic medication adjustment, based on admission A1C, diabetes medications before admission, and insulin usage during hospitalization was found useful to guide treatment decisions”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 130

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. [1]1. Jiang HJ, Stryer D, Friedman B, Andrews R. Multiple hospitalizations for patients with dia- betes. Diabetes Care 2003;26:1421–1426
  2. [4]4. Finney SJ, Zekveld C, Elia A, Evans TW. Glu- cose control and mortality in critically ill pa- tients. JAMA 2003;290:2041–2047
  3. [5]5. Van den Berghe G, Wouters PJ, Bouillon R, et al. Outcome benefit of intensive insulin ther- apy in the critically ill: Insulin dose versus glyce- mic control. Crit Care Med 2003;31:359–366
  4. [6]6. Pomposelli JJ, Baxter JK 3rd, Babineau TJ, et al. Early postoperative glucose control predicts nos- ocomial infection rate in diabetic patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 1998;22:77–81
  5. [7]7. Malmberg K, Rydén L, Efendic S, et al. Ran- domized trial of insulin-glucose infusion fol- lowed by subcutaneous insulin treatment in diabetic patients with acute myocardial infarc- tion (DIGAMI study): effects on mortality at 1 year. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26:57–65
  6. [8]8. Capes SE, Hunt D, Malmberg K, Pathak P, Gerstein HC. Stress hyperglycemia and progno- sis of stroke in nondiabetic and diabetic pa- tients: a systematic overview. Stroke 2001;32: 2426–2432
  7. [9]9. Clement S, Braithwaite SS, Magee MF, et al.; American Diabetes Association Diabetes in Hos- pitals Writing Committee. Management of dia- betes and hyperglycemia in hospitals. Diabetes Care 2004;27:553–591
  8. [11]11. Krinsley JS. Association between hypergly- cemia and increased hospital mortality in a het- erogeneous population of critically ill patients. Mayo Clin Proc 2003;78:1471–1478
  9. [13]13. Krinsley JS, Jones RL. Cost analysis of inten- sive glycemic control in critically ill adult pa- tients. Chest 2006;129:644–650
  10. [14]14. Umpierrez GE, Smiley D, Zisman A, et al. Randomized study of basal-bolus insulin ther- apy in the inpatient management of patients with type 2 diabetes (RABBIT 2 trial). Diabetes Care 2007;30:2181–2186
  11. [15]15. Umpierrez GE, Smiley D, Jacobs S, et al. Ran- domized study of basal-bolus insulin therapy in the inpatient management of patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing general surgery (RABBIT 2 surgery). Diabetes Care 2011;34:256–261
  12. [17]17. Umpierrez GE, Hellman R, Korytkowski MT, et al.; Endocrine Society. Management of hyper- glycemia in hospitalized patients in non-critical care setting: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin EndocrinolMetab 2012;97:16–38
  13. [18]18. Cook CB, Seifert KM, Hull BP, et al. Inpatient to outpatient transfer of diabetes care: planing for an effective hospital discharge. Endocr Pract 2009;15:263–269

Authors
Umpierrez, G. E., Reyes, D., Smiley, D., Hermayer, K., Khan, A., Olson, D. E., Pasquel, F., Jacobs, S., Newton, C., Peng, L., & Fonseca, V.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • Tulane Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Umpierrez, Guillermo E.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2014-10-10
Volume
37
Issue
11
Pages
2934-2939
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2091623772
Cited by
130
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000454)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (U54GM104940)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR025008)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, hospital discharge, HbA1c, glargine, basal insulin, oral antidiabetic drugs, hypoglycemia, glycemic control, treatment intensification
MeSH terms
Insulin Glargine, Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glycated Hemoglobin, Hospitalization, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Discharge, Prospective Studies, Treatment Outcome, Insulin, Long-Acting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review