Determinants of diabetes remission and glycemic control after bariatric surgery
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: Eligibility criteria for bariatric surgery in diabetes include BMI ≥35 kg/m(2) and poorly controlled glycemia. However, BMI does not predict diabetes remission, and thus, predictors need to be identified. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Seven hundred twenty-seven patients were included in a database merged from the Swedish Obese Subjects (SOS) study and two randomized controlled studies, with 415 surgical and 312 medical patients in total. Bariatric operations were divided into gastric only (GO) and gastric plus diversion (GD). RESULTS: Sixty-four percent of patients in the surgical arm and 15.0% in the medical arm experienced diabetes remission (P < 0.001). GO yielded 60% remission, and GD yielded 76% remission. The best predictors of diabetes remission were lower baseline glycemia and shorter diabetes duration. However, when operation type was considered, GD predicted a higher likelihood of remission and greater weight loss. Patients in remission (responders) lost more weight (25% vs. 17%) and waist circumference (18% vs. 13%) and experienced better insulin sensitivity than nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery is more effective than medical treatment in achieving diabetes remission and tighter glycemic control. Shorter diabetes duration, lower fasting glycemia before surgery, and GD versus GO procedures independently predict higher rates of remission, whereas baseline HbA1c and waist circumference predict improved glycemic control. The results show the advantage of an early operation together with better controlled glycemia on diabetes remission independently of BMI.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 19 · Cited by 198
- Authors
- Panunzi, S., Carlsson, L., De Gaetano, A., Peltonen, M., Rice, T., Sjöström, L., Mingrone, G., & Dixon, J. B.
- Affiliations
- National Research Council (IT)
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- CNR-Institute for Systems Analysis and Computer Science (IASI), BioMatLab, Rome, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
- King's College London (GB)
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2015-12-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 166-174
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2185925449
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 19
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 18.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- kclpure.kcl.ac.uk
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- bariatric surgery, diabetes remission, glycemic control, gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, predictors of remission, diabetes duration, fasting blood glucose, HbA1c, waist circumference, insulin sensitivity, weight loss, obesity, Swedish Obese Subjects study
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Insulin Resistance, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Remission Induction, Sweden, Weight Loss, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Bariatric Surgery, Waist Circumference
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review