Cited by 173Diabetes Management and ResearchSkin Diseases and DiabetesIntramuscular injections and effects

Insulin Injection Into Lipohypertrophic Tissue: Blunted and More Variable Insulin Absorption and Action and Impaired Postprandial Glucose Control

Famulla, Susanne, Hövelmann, Ulrike, Fischer, Annelie, Coester, Hans-Veit, Hermanski, Lidia, Kaltheuner, Matthias, Kaltheuner, Lars, Heinemann, Lutz +2 more·2016·Diabetes Care

Abstract

Objective Lipohypertrophy (LHT) is common in insulin-treated patients but its exact impact on insulin absorption and action is unclear. Research design and methods In this crossover study, 13 patients with type 1 diabetes received subcutaneous abdominal injections of 0.15 units/kg insulin lispro into LHT (confirmed by examination and ultrasound) and normal adipose tissue (NAT). On one day, a euglycemic clamp was performed with two injections each into LHT and NAT, and on another day one injection per region was given before a standardized mixed meal (75 g carbohydrates), all in randomized order. Results Compared with NAT, LHT reduced insulin absorption (mean area under the insulin concentration curve [AUCINS0-4h] 131 vs. 165 h * mU/L [LHT vs. NAT]; Cmax 61 vs. 79 mU/L, P Conclusions Insulin absorption and action are blunted and considerably more variable with LHT injection, leading to profound deterioration in postprandial glucose control.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc16-0610

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Famulla, S., Hövelmann, U., Fischer, A., Coester, H.-V., Hermanski, L., Kaltheuner, M., Kaltheuner, L., Heinemann, L., Heise, T., & Hirsch, L.
Affiliations
  • Profil Institute for Metabolic Research (DE)
  • Gemeinschaftspraxis Kaltheuner, Leverkusen, Germany
  • Becton Dickinson (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Heise, Tim
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2016-07-13
Volume
39
Issue
9
Pages
1486-1492
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2471195373
Cited by
173
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 25 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 4
FWCI
18.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Diseases and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Intramuscular injections and effects
Keywords
lipohypertrophy, insulin absorption, insulin action, insulin lispro, type 1 diabetes, postprandial glucose control, subcutaneous insulin injection, within-person variability, hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, euglycemic clamp, mixed meal tolerance, adipose tissue
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Injections, Subcutaneous, Insulin, Lipodystrophy, Male, Middle Aged, Glucose Clamp Technique, Cross-Over Studies, Postprandial Period, Insulin Lispro

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review