Cited by 23Diabetes Treatment and ManagementPancreatitis Pathology and TreatmentPancreatic function and diabetes

Pancreatic Effects of Liraglutide or Sitagliptin in Overweight Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A 12-Week Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Open access
Smits, Mark M., Tonneijck, Lennart, Muskiet, Marcel H.A., Kramer, Mark H.H., Pieters-van den Bos, Indra C., Vendrik, Karuna E.W., Hoekstra, Trynke, Bruno, Marco J. +3 more·2017·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To assess the mechanistic effects of the glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist liraglutide and the dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitor sitagliptin on (exocrine) pancreatic physiology and morphology. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS For this randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial, 55 patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin and/or sulfonylurea agents were included. Participants received liraglutide 1.8 mg (n = 19), sitagliptin 100 mg (n = 19), or matching placebos (n = 17) once daily for 12 weeks. The primary end point was change in exocrine function (intraduodenal pancreatic fluid secretion, lipase activity, fecal elastase-1, and chymotrypsin). Secondary end points included changes in plasma enzyme concentrations and pancreatic morphology (per MRI). RESULTS No patient developed pancreatitis. Sitagliptin increased intraduodenal pancreatic fluid secretion by 16.3 mL (95% CI −0.3 to 32.9; P = 0.05), whereas liraglutide did not change exocrine pancreatic function. Neither therapy increased lipase/amylase levels after 12 weeks. However, liraglutide increased lipase levels after 6 weeks (23.5 U/L [95% CI 2.1–44.8]; P = 0.03) and sitagliptin increased amylase levels after 2 and 6 weeks (13.7 U/L [95% CI 3.4–23.9]; P = 0.03). Both drugs increased plasma trypsinogen after 12 weeks (liraglutide: 34.6 µg/mL [95% CI 15.1–54.2], P = 0.001; sitagliptin: 23.9 µg/mL [95% CI 4.9–42.9], P = 0.01). Neither changed pancreatic morphology, although liraglutide tended to increase pancreatic volume (7.7 cm3 [95% CI −1.2 to 16.6]; P = 0.09). Treatment-induced volume expansion was associated with increased amylase levels. CONCLUSIONS A 12-week treatment with liraglutide or sitagliptin only resulted in a brief and modest increase of plasma pancreatic enzyme concentrations in patients with type 2 diabetes. Apart from a minimal sitagliptin-induced increase in intraduodenal fluid secretion, pancreatic exocrine function was unaffected. The long-term clinical consequences of these discrete changes require further study.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc16-0836

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The liraglutide-induced increase in pancreatic enzymes is not associated with changes in pancreatic exocrine function or pancreas size measured by magnetic resonance imaging.

    “Moreover, our group previously demonstrated that the liraglutide-induced increase in pancreatic enzymes is not associated with changes in pancreatic exocrine function or pancreas size measured by magnetic resonance imaging (69).”

    From Safety of Semaglutide (2021) · cites this paper as [69]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smits, M. M., Tonneijck, L., Muskiet, M. H. A., Kramer, M. H. H., Pieters-van den Bos, I. C., Vendrik, K. E. W., Hoekstra, T., Bruno, M. J., Diamant, M., van Raalte, D. H., & Cahen, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
  • Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Diabetes Center, Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
Corresponding author
Smits, Mark M.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2016-12-20
Volume
40
Issue
3
Pages
301-308
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2561595078
Cited by
23
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Seventh Framework Programme (282521)
  • Sanochemia Diagnostics Deutschland GmbH
  • Novo Nordisk
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
liraglutide, sitagliptin, type 2 diabetes, overweight, pancreatic exocrine function, pancreatic morphology, GLP-1 receptor agonists, DPP-4 inhibitors, lipase, amylase, trypsinogen, fecal elastase, drug safety, pancreatitis
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Sitagliptin Phosphate, Liraglutide, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Adult, Aged, alpha-Amylases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Lipase, Male, Metformin, Middle Aged, Pancreas, Trypsinogen, Treatment Outcome, Endpoint Determination, White People, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review