Renal Effects of DPP-4 Inhibitor Sitagliptin or GLP-1 Receptor Agonist Liraglutide in Overweight Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A 12-Week, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP-4I) sitagliptin or glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist liraglutide treatment on renal hemodynamics, tubular functions, and markers of renal damage in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes without chronic kidney disease (CKD). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this 12-week, randomized, double-blind trial, 55 insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (mean ± SEM: age 63 ± 7 years, BMI 31.8 ± 4.1 kg/m2, glomerular filtration rate [GFR] 83 ± 16 mL/min/1.73 m2; median [interquartile range]: albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) 1.09 mg/mmol [0.47–3.31]) received sitagliptin (100 mg/day), liraglutide (1.8 mg/day), or matching placebos. GFR (primary end point) and effective renal plasma flow (ERPF) were determined by inulin and para-aminohippuric acid clearance, respectively. Intrarenal hemodynamic variables were estimated. Absolute and fractional excretions of sodium (FENa), potassium, and urea (FEU) and renal damage markers (ACR, neutrophil gelatinase–associated lipocalin [NGAL], and kidney injury molecule-1 [KIM-1]) were measured. Plasma renin concentration (PRC) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) were assessed. At weeks 2 and 6, estimated GFR and fractional electrolyte excretions were determined. RESULTS: At week 12, GFR was not affected by sitagliptin (−6 mL/min/1.73 m2 [95% CI −14 to 3], P = 0.17) or liraglutide (+3 mL/min/1.73 m2 [−5 to 11], P = 0.46), compared with placebo. Sitagliptin modestly reduced estimated glomerular hydraulic pressure (PGLO; P = 0.043). ERPF, other intrarenal hemodynamic variables, renal damage markers, and PRC did not change for both treatments. Both agents reduced HbA1c. Only at week 2, sitagliptin increased FENa and FEU (P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Twelve-week treatment with sitagliptin or liraglutide does not affect measured renal hemodynamics. No sustained changes in tubular functions or alteration in renal damage markers were observed. The validity and clinical relevance of the slight sitagliptin-induced PGLO reduction remains speculative.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In an uncontrolled study in people with type 2 diabetes, liraglutide initially lowered eGFR, but this result was not confirmed in placebo-controlled studies that assessed measured GFR and kidney hemodynamic function by gold-standard tracer methods.
“In an uncontrolled study in people with T2D, liraglutide initially lowered eGFR (35), but this result was not confirmed in placebo-controlled studies that assessed mGFR and kidney hemodynamic function by gold-standard tracer methods (36).”
From GLP-1 agonists in the treatment of chronic kidney disease in type 2 diabetes and obesity (2025) · cites this paper as [36]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 113
- Authors
- Tonneijck, L., Smits, M. M., Muskiet, M. H. A., Hoekstra, T., Kramer, M. H. H., Danser, A. H. J., ter Wee, P. M., Diamant, M., Joles, J. A., & van Raalte, D. H.
- Affiliations
- Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
- Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
- Erasmus MC (NL)
- Department of Nephrology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Diabetes Center, Department of Internal Medicine, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Tonneijck, Lennart
- ORCID
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2016-09-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2042-2050
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2518652627
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2
- FWCI
- 15.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2019-03-01)
- Open access
- green
- pure.amsterdamumc.nl
- Licence
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Community's Seventh Framework Programme (grant agreement 282521, the SAFEGUARD project)
- Dutch Kidney Foundation (grant agreement IP12.87)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
- Keywords
- sitagliptin, liraglutide, type 2 diabetes, overweight, renal hemodynamics, glomerular filtration rate, effective renal plasma flow, intrarenal hemodynamics, tubular function, sodium and potassium excretion, albuminuria, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, KIM-1, plasma renin
- MeSH terms
- Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Sitagliptin Phosphate, Liraglutide, Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Double-Blind Method, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Kidney, Male, Middle Aged, Potassium, Renin, Sodium, Body Mass Index, Treatment Outcome, Overweight, Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review