Cited by 123Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementCardiovascular Function and Risk FactorsDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Prognostic impact of diabetes on long-term survival outcomes in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis

Dauriz, Marco, Mantovani, Alessandro, Bonapace, Stefano, Verlato, Giuseppe, Zoppini, Giacomo, Bonora, Enzo, Targher, Giovanni·2017·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Several studies have explored the impact of diabetes on mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). However, the extent to which diabetes may confer risk of mortality and hospitalization in this patient population remains imperfectly known. Here we examine the independent prognostic impact of diabetes on the long-term risk of mortality and hospitalization in patients with HF. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: ≥1,000) observational registries and randomized controlled trials with a follow-up duration of at least 1 year. Eligible studies were selected according to predefined keywords and clinical outcomes. Data from selected studies were extracted, and meta-analysis was performed using random-effects modeling. RESULTS: A total of 31 registries and 12 clinical trials with 381,725 patients with acute and chronic HF and 102,036 all-cause deaths over a median follow-up of 3 years were included in the final analysis. Diabetes was associated with a higher risk of all-cause death (random-effects hazard ratio [HR] 1.28 [95% CI 1.21, 1.35]), cardiovascular death (1.34 [1.20, 1.49]), hospitalization (1.35 [1.20, 1.50]), and the combined end point of all-cause death or hospitalization (1.41 [1.29, 1.53]). The impact of diabetes on mortality and hospitalization was greater in patients with chronic HF than in those with acute HF. Limitations included high heterogeneity and varying degrees of confounder adjustment across individual studies. CONCLUSIONS: This updated meta-analysis shows that the presence of diabetes per se adversely affects long-term survival and risk of hospitalization in patients with acute and chronic HF.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc17-0697

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 82 · Cited by 123

Authors
Dauriz, M., Mantovani, A., Bonapace, S., Verlato, G., Zoppini, G., Bonora, E., & Targher, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • Division of Cardiology, ‘‘Sacro Cuore’’ Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
Corresponding author
Targher, Giovanni
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2017-10-12
Volume
40
Issue
11
Pages
1597-1605
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2766249762
Cited by
123
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 8
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
diabetes mellitus, heart failure, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization, prognosis, chronic heart failure, acute heart failure, long-term survival
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Heart Failure, Hospitalization, Humans, Prognosis, Registries, Incidence, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Endpoint Determination, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review