Effect of A1C and glucose on postoperative mortality in noncardiac and cardiac surgeries
Abstract
Objective Hemoglobin A 1c (A1C) is used in assessment of patients for elective surgeries because hyperglycemia increases risk of adverse events. However, the interplay of A1C, glucose, and surgical outcomes remains unclarified, with often only two of these three factors considered simultaneously. We assessed the association of preoperative A1C with perioperative glucose control and their relationship with 30-day mortality. Research design and methods Retrospective analysis on 431,480 surgeries within the Duke University Health System determined the association of preoperative A1C with perioperative glucose (averaged over the first 3 postoperative days) and 30-day mortality among 6,684 noncardiac and 6,393 cardiac surgeries with A1C and glucose measurements. A generalized additive model was used, enabling nonlinear relationships. Results A1C and glucose were strongly associated. Glucose and mortality were positively associated for noncardiac cases: 1.0% mortality at mean glucose of 100 mg/dL and 1.6% at mean glucose of 200 mg/dL. For cardiac procedures, there was a striking U-shaped relationship between glucose and mortality, ranging from 4.5% at 100 mg/dL to a nadir of 1.5% at 140 mg/dL and rising again to 6.9% at 200 mg/dL. A1C and 30-day mortality were not associated when controlling for glucose in noncardiac or cardiac procedures. Conclusions Although A1C is positively associated with perioperative glucose, it is not associated with increased 30-day mortality after control…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Perioperative hyperglycemia is a risk factor for postoperative infections and other complications.
“Perioperative hyperglycemia is a risk factor for postoperative infections and other complications (133,134).”
From 16. Diabetes Care in the Hospital: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026 (2026) · cites this paper as [134]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 41 · Cited by 140
- Authors
- van den Boom, W., Schroeder, R. A., Manning, M. W., Setji, T. L., Fiestan, G.-O., & Dunson, D. B.
- Affiliations
- Department of Statistical Science, Duke University, Durham, NC
- Duke University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schroeder, Rebecca A.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2018-02-13
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 782-788
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2791535168
- Cited by
- 140
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 6
- FWCI
- 12.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Accenture PLC
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Enhanced Recovery After Surgery
- Keywords
- HbA1c, perioperative glycemic control, hyperglycemia, postoperative mortality, 30-day mortality, cardiac surgery, non-cardiac surgery, U-shaped relationship, surgical outcomes
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Female, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Male, Middle Aged, Postoperative Complications, Postoperative Period, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Hospital Mortality
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review