Cited by 40Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes and associated disorders

Event Rates and Risk Factors for the Development of Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Adult Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: Analysis From the DPV Registry Based on 46,966 Patients

Kalscheuer, Hannes, Seufert, Jochen, Lanzinger, Stefanie, Rosenbauer, Joachim, Karges, Wolfram, Bergis, Dominik, Mader, Julia K., Zimny, Stefan +4 more·2019·Diabetes Care

Abstract

Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is a life-threatening complication of type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) that results from absolute insulin deficiency and is marked by acidosis, ketosis, and hyperglycemia (1). Therefore, prevention of DKA is one goal in T1DM care, but recent data indicate increased incidence (2). For adult patients, only limited data are available on rates and risk factors for development of DKA, and this complication remains epidemiologically poorly characterized. The Diabetes Prospective Follow-up Registry (DPV) has followed patients with diabetes from 1995. Data for this study were collected from 2000 to 2016. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of T1DM, age at diabetes onset ≥6 months, patient age at follow-up ≥18 years, and diabetes duration ≥1 year to exclude DKA at manifestation. DKA was defined as serum pH <7.3, and rates of DKA were analyzed based on a Poisson regression model accounting for overdisperson stratified by sex, age, diabetes duration, HbA1c, treatment regimen, size of diabetes center, and migration background, i.e., whether the patient or one or both parents were born outside the countries of the registry. A diabetes center that treated ≥50 adult patients with T1DM in the year 2016 was considered large. In total, 46,966 patients were included in this study (average age 38.5 years [median 21.2], …

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc18-1160

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kalscheuer, H., Seufert, J., Lanzinger, S., Rosenbauer, J., Karges, W., Bergis, D., Mader, J. K., Zimny, S., Schmid, S. M., Hummel, M., Kerner, W., & Holl, R. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Lübeck (DE)
  • University of Freiburg (DE)
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
  • Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum e.V. (DE)
  • Section of Endocrinology and Diabetology, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
  • University Hospital Frankfurt (DE)
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
  • Helios Hospital Schwerin (DE)
  • German Center for Diabetes Research (DE)
  • Specialized Diabetes Practice, Rosenheim, Germany
  • Institute for Diabetes Gerhardt Katsch (DE)
Corresponding author
Kalscheuer, Hannes
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2019-01-17
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
e34-e36
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2909710308
Cited by
40
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
3.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
diabetic ketoacidosis, type 1 diabetes, adult patients, incidence, risk factors, insulin deficiency, HbA1c, diabetes duration, migration background

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review