Cited by 175Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and Research

Cardiovascular risk reduction with liraglutide: an exploratory mediation analysis of the LEADER trial

Open access
Buse, John B., Bain, Stephen C., Mann, Johannes F.E., Nauck, Michael A., Nissen, Steven E., Pocock, Stuart, Poulter, Neil R., Pratley, Richard E. +4 more·2020·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes: Evaluation of Cardiovascular Outcome Results (LEADER) trial (ClinicalTrials.gov reg. no. NCT01179048) demonstrated a reduced risk of cardiovascular (CV) events for patients with type 2 diabetes who received the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist liraglutide versus placebo. The mechanisms behind this CV benefit remain unclear. We aimed to identify potential mediators for the CV benefit observed with liraglutide in the LEADER trial. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We performed exploratory analyses to identify potential mediators of the effect of liraglutide on major adverse CV events (MACE; composite of CV death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke) from the following candidates: glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body weight, urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR), confirmed hypoglycemia, sulfonylurea use, insulin use, systolic blood pressure, and LDL cholesterol. These candidates were selected as CV risk factors on which liraglutide had an effect in LEADER such that a reduction in CV risk might result. We used two methods based on a Cox proportional hazards model and the new Vansteelandt method designed to use all available information from the mediator and to control for confounding factors. RESULTS: Analyses using the Cox methods and Vansteelandt method indicated potential mediation by HbA1c (up to 41% and 83% mediation, respectively) and UACR (up to 29% and 33% mediation, respectively) on the effect of liraglutide on MACE. Mediation effects were small for other candidates. CONCLUSIONS: These analyses identify HbA1c and, to a lesser extent, UACR as potential mediators of the CV effects of liraglutide. Whether either is a marker of an unmeasured factor or a true mediator remains a key question that invites further investigation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc19-2251

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Subsequent cardiovascular and kidney outcomes trials of these agents were not designed to test higher versus lower A1C; therefore, beyond limited post hoc analysis of these trials, there is limited evidence of the independent cardiovascular and kidney effects of glucose lowering when conferred by these medication classes.

    “Subsequent cardiovascular and kidney outcomes trials of these agents were not designed to test higher versus lower A1C; therefore, beyond limited post hoc analysis of these trials, there is limited evidence of the independent cardiovascular and kidney effects of glucose lowering when conferred by these medication classes (63).”

    From 6. Glycemic Goals, Hypoglycemia, and Hyperglycemic Crises: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026. (2026) · cites this paper as [63]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Randomized clinical trials examining GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors for cardiovascular safety were not designed to test higher versus lower A1C; therefore, beyond post hoc analysis of these trials, we do not have evidence that it is the glucose lowering by these agents that confers the CVD and renal benefit.

    “Randomized clinical trials examining these agents for cardiovascular safety were not designed to test higher versus lower A1C; therefore, beyond post hoc analysis of these trials, we do not have evidence that it is the glucose lowering by these agents that confers the CVD and renal benefit (53).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 28 · Cited by 175

Authors
Buse, J. B., Bain, S. C., Mann, J. F. E., Nauck, M. A., Nissen, S. E., Pocock, S., Poulter, N. R., Pratley, R. E., Linder, M., Monk Fries, T., Ørsted, D. D., & Zinman, B.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Swansea University (GB)
  • Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
  • St. Josef-Hospital (DE)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • AdventHealth Orlando (US)
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
  • Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
Corresponding author
Buse, John B.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2020-05-04
Volume
43
Issue
7
Pages
1546-1552
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W3021856094
Cited by
175
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 9
FWCI
17.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
liraglutide, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular risk reduction, mediation analysis, major adverse cardiovascular events, HbA1c, albumin-creatinine ratio, GLP-1 receptor agonists, LEADER trial
MeSH terms
Liraglutide, Mediation Analysis, Heart Disease Risk Factors, Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Angiopathies, Diabetic Nephropathies, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Stroke, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review