Frequency of interruptions to sitting time: benefits for postprandial metabolism in type 2 diabetes
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether interrupting sitting with brief bouts of simple resistance activities (SRAs) at different frequencies improves postprandial glucose, insulin, and triglycerides in adults with medication-controlled type 2 diabetes (T2D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Participants (n = 23, 10 of whom were female, with mean ± SD age 62 ± 8 years and BMI 32.7 ± 3.5 kg · m−2) completed a three-armed randomized crossover trial (6- to 14-day washout): sitting uninterrupted for 7 h (SIT), sitting with 3-min SRAs (half squats, calf raises, gluteal contractions, and knee raises) every 30 min (SRA3), and sitting with 6-min SRAs every 60 min (SRA6). Net incremental areas under the curve (iAUCnet) for glucose, insulin, and triglycerides were compared between conditions. RESULTS: Glucose and insulin 7-h iAUCnet were attenuated significantly during SRA6 (glucose 17.0 mmol · h · L−1, 95% CI 12.5, 21.4; insulin 1,229 pmol · h · L−1, 95% CI 982, 1,538) in comparison with SIT (glucose 21.4 mmol · h · L−1, 95% CI 16.9, 25.8; insulin 1,411 pmol · h · L−1, 95% CI 1,128, 1,767; P < 0.05) and in comparison with SRA3 (for glucose only) (22.1 mmol · h · L−1, 95% CI 17.7, 26.6; P = 0.01) No significant differences in glucose or insulin iAUCnet were observed in comparison of SRA3 and SIT. There was no statistically significant effect of condition on triglyceride iAUCnet. CONCLUSIONS: In adults with medication-controlled T2D, interrupting prolonged sitting with 6-min SRAs every 60 min reduced postprandial glucose and insulin responses. Other frequencies of interruptions and potential longer-term benefits require examination to clarify clinical relevance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Beneficial effects are evident across the continuum of human movement, from breaking prolonged sitting with light activity to high-intensity interval training.
“Bene fi cial effects are evident across the continuum of human movement, from breaking prolonged sitting with light activity (103) to high-intensity interval training (123).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 43 · Cited by 49
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [2]2. diabetes, cardiovascular disease and death: systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 2012;55:2895 -2905
- Authors
- Homer, A. R., Taylor, F. C., Dempsey, P. C., Wheeler, M. J., Sethi, P., Townsend, M. K., Grace, M. S., Green, D. J., Cohen, N. D., Larsen, R. N., Kingwell, B. A., Owen, N., & Dunstan, D. W.
- Affiliations
- Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute (AU)
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Homer, Ashleigh R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2021-06-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1254-1263
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- PMC
- PMC8247505
- OpenAlex
- W3159573144
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 4.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Heart Foundation Australia (101449)
- National Health and Medical Research Council (1057608)
- Victorian Government OIS
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- prolonged sitting, sitting interruptions, type 2 diabetes, postprandial blood glucose, insulin response, triglycerides, postprandial metabolism, sedentary behavior
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Insulin, Middle Aged, Walking, Cross-Over Studies, Postprandial Period
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review