Glucagon prescribing and costs among U.S. Adults with diabetes, 2011–2021
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize contemporary trends in glucagon fill rates and expenditures in a nationwide cohort of adults with diabetes overall and by key demographic and clinical characteristics. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we examined 1) glucagon fill rates per 1,000 person-years and 2) patient out-of-pocket and health plan costs per filled glucagon dose among adults with diabetes included in OptumLabs Data Warehouse between 1 January 2011 and 31 March 2021. RESULTS: The study population comprised 2,814,464 adults with diabetes with a mean age of 62.8 (SD 13.2) years. The overall glucagon fill rate decreased from 2.91 to 2.28 per 1,000 person-years (−22%) over the study period. In groups at high risk for severe hypoglycemia, glucagon fill rates increased from 22.46 to 36.76 per 1,000 person-years (64%) among patients with type 1 diabetes, 11.64 to 16.63 per 1,000 person-years (43%) among those treated with short-acting insulin, and 16.08 to 20.12 per 1,000 person-years (25%) among those with a history of severe hypoglycemia. White patients, women, individuals with high income, and commercially insured patients had higher glucagon fill rates compared with minority patients, males, individuals with low income, and Medicare Advantage patients, respectively. Total cost per dosing unit increased from $157.97 to $275.32 (74%) among commercial insurance beneficiaries and from $150.37 to $293.57 (95%) among Medicare Advantage beneficiaries. CONCLUSIONS: Glucagon fill rates are concerningly low and declined between 2011 and 2021 but increased in appropriate subgroups with type 1 diabetes, using short-acting insulin, or with a history of severe hypoglycemia. Fill rates were disproportionately low among minority patients and individuals with low income.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Appropriate glucagon prescribing is very low in current practice.
“For these individuals, clinicians should routinely review their access to glucagon, as appropriate glucagon prescribing is very low in current practice (140-142).”
From 6. Glycemic Goals, Hypoglycemia, and Hyperglycemic Crises: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026. (2026) · cites this paper as [141]
The Conclusions report concerningly low glucagon fill rates, including among patients at high risk, and call for increased prescribing. However, the authors state that prescription data were unavailable; low fills do not establish how often clinicians prescribed glucagon appropriately. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredAppropriate glucagon prescribing is low.
“Clinicians should routinely review the individual's access to glucagon, as appropriate glucagon prescribing is low (191)(192)(193).”
From 9. Pharmacologic Approaches to Glycemic Treatment: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2025 (2025) · cites this paper as [191]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 24 · Cited by 28
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [24]24. National Committee for Quality Assurance (NCQA) Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Infor- mation Set (HEDIS) Comprehensive Diabetes Care. Washington, DC, National Committee for Quality Assurance, 2015, pp. 74-98
- Authors
- Herges, J. R., Galindo, R. J., Neumiller, J. J., Heien, H. C., Umpierrez, G. E., & McCoy, R. G.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Emory University (US)
- Washington State University Spokane (US)
- Corresponding author
- Herges, Joseph R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2023-01-11
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 620-627
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- PMC
- PMC10020025
- OpenAlex
- W4315631766
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9
- FWCI
- 5.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K23DK114497)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Keywords
- glucagon, diabetes mellitus, prescribing trends, severe hypoglycemia, type 1 diabetes, short-acting insulin, health care costs, out-of-pocket costs, Medicare Advantage, private insurance, racial and ethnic disparities, income inequality, temporal trends
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Glucagon, Medicare, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, United States, Insulin, Short-Acting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review