Cited by 56Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Treatment and Management

Novel Once-Weekly Basal Insulin Fc Achieved Similar Glycemic Control With a Safety Profile Comparable to Insulin Degludec in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes

Open access
Kazda, Christof M., Bue-Valleskey, Juliana M., Chien, Jenny, Zhang, Qianyi, Chigutsa, Emmanuel, Landschulz, William, Wullenweber, Paula, Haupt, Axel +1 more·2023·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Basal Insulin Fc (BIF; insulin efsitora alfa; LY3209590), a fusion protein combining a novel single-chain insulin variant with a human IgG Fc domain, is designed for once-weekly basal insulin administration. This phase 2 study assessed safety and efficacy of BIF versus degludec in 265 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using multiple daily injections. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: During this randomized, parallel, open-label study, patients with T1D were randomized (1:1) to receive BIF once weekly or degludec once daily over the 26-week treatment period. Both groups were titrated to a fasting glucose level of 80–100 mg/dL. The primary end point was HbA1c change from baseline to week 26 (noninferiority margin, 0.4%). Secondary end points included percent time in range (TIR) (70–180 mg/dL), continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) fasting glucose (FG) level, and rate of hypoglycemia. RESULTS: After 26 weeks, patients receiving BIF had noninferior HbA1c change from baseline versus those receiving degludec, with a statistically significant treatment difference of 0.17% (90% CI 0.01, 0.32; P = 0.07) favoring the comparator. Percent TIR was similar for patients in the BIF (56.1%) and degludec (58.9%; P = 0.112) groups at week 26. FG values were significantly higher for patients receiving BIF (158.8 mg/dL) versus degludec (143.2 mg/dL; P = 0.003). Rates of CGM-derived hypoglycemia were not statistically significantly different for BIF and degludec over 24 h for level 1 (P = 0.960) or level 2 (P = 0.517) hypoglycemia during the treatment period. Occurrence of serious adverse events was similar between the BIF and degludec groups. CONCLUSIONS: Once-weekly BIF demonstrated noninferior glycemic control to once-daily degludec (treatment difference: 0.17% favoring degludec) and no difference in hypoglycemia or other safety findings in patients with T1D.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc22-2395

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Basal insulin Fc (insulin efsitora alfa) showed noninferiority in terms of glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia risk compared with degludec in a study of 266 adults with type 1 diabetes.

    “Similarly, basal insulin Fc (also referred to as insulin efsitora alfa) showed noninferiority in terms of glycaemic control and hypoglycaemia risk compared with degludec in a study of 266 adults with type 1 diabetes.88”

    From The future of type 1 diabetes therapy (2025) · cites this paper as [88]

    The Abstract Results report noninferior HbA1c change with basal insulin Fc versus degludec, and no statistically significant difference in hypoglycemia rates; they do not report a noninferiority finding for hypoglycemia risk. The Results state that 266 adults with type 1 diabetes were randomized, although the Abstract describes 265 patients in the study. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 13 · Cited by 56

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. [2]Foster NC, Beck RW, Miller KM,. State of type 1 diabetes management and outcomes from the T1D Exchange in 2016-2018. Diabetes Technol Ther 2019; 21: 66– 72 30657336 PMC7061293
  2. [3]Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group. Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring in a clinical care environment: evidence from the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring (JDRF-CGM) trial. Diabetes Care 2010; 33: 17– 22 19837791 PMC2797966
  3. [5]Oldham V, Mumford B, Lee D, Jones J, Das G. Impact of insulin pump therapy on key parameters of diabetes management and diabetes related emotional distress in the first 12 months. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2020; 166: 108281 32628980
  4. [6]Moyers JS, Hansen RJ, Day JW,. Preclinical characterization of LY3209590, a novel weekly basal insulin Fc-fusion protein. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2022; 382: 346– 355 35840338
  5. [7]Heise T, Chien J, Beals JM,. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the novel basal insulin fc (insulin efsitora alfa), an insulin fusion protein in development for once-weekly dosing for the treatment of patients with diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2023; 25: 1080– 90 36541037
  6. [8]Frias J, Chien J, Zhang Q,. Safety and efficacy of once-weekly basal insulin fc in people with type 2 diabetes previously treated with basal insulin: A multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2023; 11: 158– 68 36758572
  7. [9]Qu Y, Luo J, Garhyan P, Antalis CJ, Chang AM, Jacober SJ. Dose unit establishment for a new basal insulin using joint modeling of insulin dose and glycemic response. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2018; 12: 155– 162 28466661 PMC5761965
  8. [10]Riddle MC, Rosenstock J; Insulin Glargine 4002 Study Investigators. The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 3080– 3086 14578243
  9. [11]Maxwell DB, Fisher EA, Ross-Clunis HA 3rd, Estep HL. Serum alkaline phosphatase in diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Nutr 1986; 5: 55– 59 3700883
  10. [12]Davies MJ, Gross JL, Ono Y,.; BEGIN BB T1 Study Group. Efficacy and safety of insulin degludec given as part of basal-bolus treatment with mealtime insulin aspart in type 1 diabetes: a 26-week randomized, open-label, treat-to-target non-inferiority trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 2014; 16: 922– 930 24702700 PMC4237553
  11. [13]Novo Nordisk. Novo Nordisk achieves primary objectives of ONWARDS 1 and 6 trials with once-weekly insulin icodec demonstrating superior reduction in HbA1c vs insulin glargine U100 in ONWARDS 1 [press release]. 3 June 2022. Accessed 12 January 2023. Available from: https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2022/06/03/2455751/0/en/Novo-Nordisk-achieves-primary-objectives-of-ONWARDS-1-and-6-trials-with-once-weekly-insulin-icodec-demonstrating-superior-reduction-in-HbA1c-vs-insulin-glargine-U100-in-ONWARDS-1.html
  12. [14]Heise T. The future of insulin therapy. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2021; 175: 108820 33865915

Authors
Kazda, C. M., Bue-Valleskey, J. M., Chien, J., Zhang, Q., Chigutsa, E., Landschulz, W., Wullenweber, P., Haupt, A., & Dahl, D.
Affiliations
  • 1Lilly France, Neuilly sur Seine, France
  • 2Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
  • 3Gemeinschaftspraxis für Innere Medizin und Diabetologie, Hamburg, Germany
Corresponding author
Kazda, Christof M.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2023-03-15
Volume
46
Issue
5
Pages
1052-1059
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W4324304840
Cited by
56
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 9
FWCI
11.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eli Lilly and Company
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
insulin degludec, type 1 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, hypoglycemia, time in range, continuous glucose monitoring, non-inferiority, multiple daily insulin injections, safety profile, IgG Fc
MeSH terms
Insulin Glargine, Glycemic Control, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Insulin, Long-Acting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review