Cited by 473Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

2. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes: Standards of Care in Diabetes—2026

Open access
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes*, Bajaj, Mandeep, McCoy, Rozalina G., Balapattabi, Kirthikaa, Bannuru, Raveendhara R., Bellini, Natalie J., Bennett, Allison K., Beverly, Elizabeth A. +18 more·2026·Diabetes Care

Abstract

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) “Standards of Care in Diabetes” includes the ADA’s current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes, an interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA’s clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc26-s002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 220 · Cited by 473

Authors
American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee for Diabetes*, Bajaj, M., McCoy, R. G., Balapattabi, K., Bannuru, R. R., Bellini, N. J., Bennett, A. K., Beverly, E. A., Briggs Early, K., ChallaSivaKanaka, S., Echouffo-Tcheugui, J. B., Everett, B. M., Garg, R., Laffel, L. M., Lal, R., Matfin, G., Pandya, N., Pekas, E. J., Peters, A. L., Pilla, S. J., Romeo, G. R., Rosas, S. E., Segal, A. R., Simmons, K. M., Szmuilowicz, E. D., & ElSayed, N. A.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2025-12-08
Volume
49
Issue
Supplement_1
Pages
S27-S49
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W4417121491
Cited by
473
References
220
Citations by year
2026: 470 · 2025: 3
FWCI
63.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
diabetes diagnosis, diabetes classification, diabetes diagnosis criteria, clinical guidelines, quality of care
MeSH terms
Diabetes Mellitus, Humans, Standard of Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review