The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Further Characterization of the Impaired Bactericidal Function of Granulocytes in Patients with Poorly Controlled Diabetes
Abstract
Granulocytes of patients with diabetes mellitus have an impaired capability to engulf bacteria, but it is not clear whether subsequent intracellular killing, which has separate energy sources, is also defective. We separately assayed engulfment and intracellular killing of Staphylococcus aureus 502a by granulocytes of 17 diabetic patients with fasting hyperglycemia to better characterize the phagocytic defect. Diabetic granulocytes engulfed a smaller proportion than controls of a 106 inoculum of bacteria after 20 minutes of incubation in vitro (56.8 ± 9.4 per cent versus 72.4 ± 3.6 per cent, mean ± S.E. of 10 patients and paired controls, p < 0.05), but after 60 minutes of incubation this defect had disappeared. Intracellular killing of staphylococci by granulocytes from seven diabetics (68.6 ± 8.9 per cent of a 106 inoculum) was less (p < 0.01) than that of paired controls (80.3 ± 4.5 per cent) after two hours of incubation. Seven patients were retested during a period of improved diabetes' control; intracellular killing of staphylococci by granulocytes of six of the seven increased considerably and either exceeded the paired control value or approached it to within 75 per cent. These data suggest that a primary defect exists in intracellular killing of staphylococci by granulocytes from poorly controlled diabetics in addition to that previously shown in engulfment. This bactericidal activity becomes more efficient when the diabetes is brought under better control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Singer, A. J., & Clark, R. A. F. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199909023411006 · Cited by 6,106
Wound Microbiology and Associated Approaches to Wound Management
Bowler, P. G., Duerden, B. I., & Armstrong, D. G. (2001) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.14.2.244-269.2001 · Cited by 1,634
Kolluru, G. K., Bir, S. C., & Kevil, C. G. (2012) · International Journal of Vascular Medicine · doi:10.1155/2012/918267 · Cited by 720
Common infections in diabetes: Pathogenesis, management and relationship to glycaemic control
Peleg, A. Y., Weerarathna, T., McCarthy, J. S., & Davis, T. M. E. (2007) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.682 · Cited by 584
Dynamic reciprocity in the wound microenvironment
Schultz, G. S., Davidson, J. M., Kirsner, R. S., Bornstein, P., & Herman, I. M. (2011) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1111/j.1524-475x.2011.00673.x · Cited by 490
Metadata
- Authors
- Nolan, C. M., Beaty, H. N., & Bagdade, J. D.
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1978-09-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 889-894
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W2037535348
- Cited by
- 242
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Further Characterization of the Impaired Bactericidal Function of Granulocytes in Patients with Poorly Controlled Diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diab.27.9.889
- The paper
- Nolan, C. M., Beaty, H. N., & Bagdade, J. D. (1978). Further Characterization of the Impaired Bactericidal Function of Granulocytes in Patients with Poorly Controlled Diabetes. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.27.9.889
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.