The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nonenzymatic Glucosylation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Alters Its Biologic Activity
Abstract
Human low-density lipoprotein (LDL) was glucosylated by incubation in vitro with glucose (20–80 mM) with or without addition of cyanoborohydride. The incorporation of covalently bound glucose was linear over time, and amino acid analysis showed the presence of glucosyllysine residues. The glucosylated LDL (glc LDL) moved more rapidly than normal LDL on agarose electrophoresis. The rate of degradation of 125I-labeled glucosylated LDL (glc LDL) by cultured human fibroblasts was reduced compared with that of native 125I-LDL, the difference increasing with extent of glucosylation. Effects were seen with blockage of as few as 6–15﹪ of the LDL lysine residues; high-affinity degradation was completely lost when one-third of the lysine residues were blocked. Conjugation of LDL with glucose-6-phosphate also blocked high-affinity uptake and degradation. Whereas native LDL uptake inhibited the activity of β-hydroxy-β-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase and stimulated acyl coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase activity, glc LDL had no effects on these enzymes. The fractional catabolic rate of glc LDL in guinea pigs was reduced. Degradation of glc LDL by mouse peritoneal macrophages was not significantly faster than that of native LDL. Finally, the presence of glc LDL in human plasma was demonstrated. Preliminary data show that 1.3﹪ of lysine residues in normal LDL and 2–5.3﹪ of lysines in diabetic LDL were glucosylated. Since, like other plasma proteins, LDL undergoes glucosylation in diabetes, its turnover and sites of catabolism may differ from normal and this may be relevant to the accelerated atherosclerosis of diabetes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus
Galicia-Garcia, U., Benito-Vicente, A., Jebari, S., Larrea-Sebal, A., Siddiqi, H., Uribe, K. B., Ostolaza, H., & Martín, C. (2020) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms21176275 · Cited by 3,360
“sdLDL particles are also more likely to be glycated, more resistant to breakdown, and more susceptible to oxidation by free radicals [226].”
BackgroundMeta-analysis: glycosylated hemoglobin and cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus
Selvin, E., Marinopoulos, S., Berkenblit, G., Rami, T., Brancati, F. L., Powe, N. R., & Golden, S. H. (2004) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-141-6-200409210-00007 · Cited by 1,657
Periodontal Disease and Diabetes Mellitus: A Two‐Way Relationship
Grossi, S. G., & Genco, R. J. (1998) · Annals of Periodontology · doi:10.1902/annals.1998.3.1.51 · Cited by 842
Pathophysiology of diabetic dyslipidaemia: where are we?
Vergès, B. (2015) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-015-3525-8 · Cited by 708
Fructosamine: structure, analysis, and clinical usefulness.
Armbruster, D. A. (1987) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/33.12.2153 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Witztum, J. L., Mahoney, E. M., Branks, M. J., Fisher, M., Elam, R., & Steinberg, D.
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1982-04-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 283-291
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W2030029464
- Cited by
- 352
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nonenzymatic Glucosylation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Alters Its Biologic Activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diab.31.4.283
- The paper
- Witztum, J. L., Mahoney, E. M., Branks, M. J., Fisher, M., Elam, R., & Steinberg, D. (1982). Nonenzymatic Glucosylation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Alters Its Biologic Activity. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.31.4.283
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.