Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Quantitative Evaluation of Cardiac Parasympathetic Activity in Normal and Diabetic Man

Pfeifer, Michael A, Cook, Daniel, Brodsky, Joel, Tice, David, Reenan, A, Swedine, Sally, Halter, Jeffrey B, Porte, Daniel·1982·Diabetes

Abstract

Heart rate and RR variation (the standard deviation of the mean RR interval for a 5-min period) were evaluated as measurements of cardiac parasympathetic nervous system activity in fasting supine diabetic (N = 22) and comparable age normal (N = 22) subjects. The rate of breathing did not effect heart rate, but was inversely related to the RR variation (r = 0.89, P < 0.01). Heart rate was increased (P < 0.0001) and RR variation decreased (P < 0.05) during β-adrenergic stimulation with isoproterenol and during parasympathetic blockade with atropine (both P < 0.0001). Hence, the cardiac effects of β-adrenergic stimulation may mimic the effects of diminished parasympathetic function. To evaluate parasympathetic control of RR variation, independently of possible effects of increased sympathetic activities, studies were performed during β-adrenergic blockade with propranolol. RR variation during propranolol was less both in 14 diabetic subjects without clinical symptoms of autonomic neuropathy (P < 0.005) and in 8 diabetics with clinical symptoms of autonomic neuropathy (P < 0.001) when compared with 22 age-comparable normal subjects. The measurement of RR variation was very reproducible with a day-to-day coefficient of variation of 9.7 ± 2.8﹪ (x̄ ± SEM) in diabetic subjects with stable hyperglycemia. It is concluded that supine RR variation during a deep respiratory rate and during β-adrenergic blockade is a sensitive, quantitative, and reproducible method to evaluate parasympathetic nervous activity in normal and diabetic subjects. Furthermore, cardiac parasympathetic activity may be diminished in diabetic subjects before clinical symptoms of autonomic neuropathy are evident.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diab.31.4.339

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Pfeifer, M. A., Cook, D., Brodsky, J., Tice, D., Reenan, A., Swedine, S., Halter, J. B., & Porte, D.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
1982-04-01
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
339-345
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2113965930
Cited by
256
References
0
FWCI
6.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Evaluation of Cardiac Parasympathetic Activity in Normal and Diabetic Man. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diab.31.4.339
The paper
Pfeifer, M. A., Cook, D., Brodsky, J., Tice, D., Reenan, A., Swedine, S., Halter, J. B., & Porte, D. (1982). Quantitative Evaluation of Cardiac Parasympathetic Activity in Normal and Diabetic Man. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.31.4.339

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.