Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 546

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Estimation of Endogenous Glucose Production During Hyperinsulinemic-Euglycemic Glucose Clamps: Comparison of Unlabeled and Labeled Exogenous Glucose Infusates

Finegood, Diane T, Bergman, Richard N, Vranic, Mladen·1987·Diabetes

Abstract

Tracer methodology has been applied extensively to the estimation of endogenous glucose production (Ra) during euglycemic glucose clamps. The accuracy of this approach has been questioned due to the observation of significantly negative estimates for Ra when insulin levels are high. We performed hyperinsulinemic (300 μU/ml)-euglycemic glucose clamps for 180 min in normal dogs and compared the standard approach, an unlabeled exogenous glucose infusate (cold GINF protocol, n = 12), to a new approach in which a tracer (D-[3-3H]glucose) was added to the exogenous glucose used for clamping (hot GINF protocol, n = 10). Plasma glucose, insulin and glucagon concentrations, and glucose infusion rates were similar for the two protocols. Plasma glucose specific activity was 20 ± 1% of basal (at 120–180 min) in the cold GINF studies, and 44 ± 3 to 187 ± 5% of basal in the hot GINF studies. With the one-compartment, fixed pool volume model of Steele, Ra, for the cold GINF studies was –2.4 ± 0.7 mg · min−1 · kg−1 at 25 min and remained significantly negative until 110 min (P < .05). For the hot GINF studies, Ra was never significantly less than zero (P > .05) and was greater than in the cold GINF studies at 20–90 min (P < .05). There was substantially less between-(78%) and within- (40%) experiment variation for the hot GINF studies compared with the cold GINF studies. An alternate approach (regression method) to the application of the one-compartment model, which allows for a variable and estimable effective distribution volume, yielded Ra estimates that were suppressed 60–100% from basal. In conclusion, the one-compartment, fixed pool volume model of glucose kinetics is inadequate for the estimation of Ra during euglycemic glucose clamps. Two new strategies for estimating Ra from the one-compartment model, the hot GINF protocol and the regression method calculation, yielded more accurate and physiologically plausible estimates of Ra than currently used methodology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diab.36.8.914

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 546

Metadata

Authors
Finegood, D. T., Bergman, R. N., & Vranic, M.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
1987-08-01
Volume
36
Issue
8
Pages
914-924
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2135666165
Cited by
546
References
0
FWCI
14.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimation of Endogenous Glucose Production During Hyperinsulinemic-Euglycemic Glucose Clamps: Comparison of Unlabeled and Labeled Exogenous Glucose Infusates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diab.36.8.914
The paper
Finegood, D. T., Bergman, R. N., & Vranic, M. (1987). Estimation of Endogenous Glucose Production During Hyperinsulinemic-Euglycemic Glucose Clamps: Comparison of Unlabeled and Labeled Exogenous Glucose Infusates. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.36.8.914

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.