The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Compensatory Growth of Pancreatic β-Cells in Adult Rats After Short-Term Glucose Infusion
Abstract
The extent to which adult pancreatic β-cells can respond in vivo to a sustained glucose stimulus by increasing their mass through either hyperplasia or hypertrophy has remained unanswered. Therefore, we studied the in vivo effect of short-term (96-h) hyperglycemia on the growth of β-cells by infusing adult rats with 35 or 50% glucose or 0.45% saline. After 96 h of glucose infusion, the β-cell mass, quantified by point-counting morphometrics of immunoperoxidase-stained paraffin sections, showed a 50% increase (9.57 ± 0.87 mg, n = 5, 50% glucose infused; 9.50 ± 1.23, n = 7, 35% glucose infused; 6.15 ± 0.55, n = 6, 0.45% saline infused). This growth was selective for β-cells; the non-β-cell mass was unchanged. The mitotic index, measured by accumulated mitotic frequency after a 4-h colchicine treatment, increased fivefold in glucose-infused animals compared to saline-infused animals. This enhanced replication of β-cells provides evidence for increase in cell number or hyperplasia. In addition, hypertrophy of the β-cells was also quantified. Mean cell volume, determined from the mean cell cross-sectional area measured planimetrically from low-magnification electron micrographs, increased to 150% of control values after 96 h of 50% glucose infusion. Seven days after the 96-h infusion, in reversal experiments, the β-cell mass had not returned to saline-infused levels. In addition, the non-β-cell mass of glucose-infused animals had increased. The mitotic index of the β-cells of glucose-infused rats was, however, significantly lower than that of the saline controls, but the mean cell volume of the β-cells remained elevated. Thus, with a short-term in vivo stimulus, adultβ-cells have a far greater capacity to respond with compensatory growth by hyperplasia and hypertrophy than has been appreciated before. Even 7 days after discontinuation of the stimulus, β-cell mass remains elevated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mechanisms linking obesity to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes
Kahn, S. E., Hull, R. L., & Utzschneider, K. M. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05482 · Cited by 5,448
β-Cell Deficit and Increased β-Cell Apoptosis in Humans With Type 2 Diabetes
Butler, A. E., Janson, J., Bonner-Weir, S., Ritzel, R., Rizza, R. A., & Butler, P. C. (2003) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diabetes.52.1.102 · Cited by 4,011
Self-citationPostic, C., Shiota, M., Niswender, K. D., Jetton, T. L., Chen, Y., Moates, J. M., Shelton, K. D., Lindner, J., Cherrington, A. D., & Magnuson, M. A. (1999) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.274.1.305 · Cited by 1,302
Michael, M. D., Kulkarni, R. N., Postic, C., Previs, S. F., Shulman, G. I., Magnuson, M. A., & Kahn, C. R. (2000) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(05)00015-8 · Cited by 1,296
Beta Cell Dysfunction and Insulin Resistance
Cerf, M. E. (2013) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2013.00037 · Cited by 964
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonner-Weir, S., Deery, D., Leahy, J. L., & Weir, G. C.
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1989-01-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-53
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W2138463340
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Compensatory Growth of Pancreatic β-Cells in Adult Rats After Short-Term Glucose Infusion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diab.38.1.49
- The paper
- Bonner-Weir, S., Deery, D., Leahy, J. L., & Weir, G. C. (1989). Compensatory Growth of Pancreatic β-Cells in Adult Rats After Short-Term Glucose Infusion. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/diab.38.1.49
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.