Metabolic Effects of Hypocaloric Diets in Management of Gestational Diabetes
Abstract
Although hypocaloric diets have been advocated for the management of the obese gravida and the obese mother with gestational diabetes, there is no general agreement on how severely calories should be restricted or on how this therapeutic approach compares with insulin therapy. The lack of consensus is in part because of the lack of studies comparing insulin management with the effects of different degrees of hypocaloric feeding and its effects on metabolism and glycemic status. We review the effects of 50 and 33% calorie restriction on glycemic status and intermediary fuel status in obese gestational diabetic subjects and compare the results with the administration of 20 U NPH and 10 U regular insulin every morning, a therapy of proven value in reducing macrosomia in gestational diabetes. When the two calorie-restriction regimens were compared after a 9-h overnight fast, glycemic status improved 10-20% on both. Ketonuria increased about twofold with 50% calorie restriction, but on average no increase in ketonuria was seen on the 33% calorie-restriction regimen. Both calorie-restriction programs led to a reduction in levels of plasma triglyceride, a correlate of infant birth weight. In contrast, the insulin regimen diminished ketonuria, but glycemic status improved little, and plasma triglyceride concentrations did not decline. Although more studies are needed to confirm these trends, the beneficial effect of 33% calorie restriction, which occurred without marked ketonuria, is consistent with previous studies in gestational diabetes. In addition, the simultaneous improvements observed in plasma glucose and triglyceride concentrations suggest that moderate calorie restriction may be valuable in preventing macrosomia in the offspring of the obese subject with gestational diabetes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A 50% calorie restriction in women with GDM at 30-33 weeks gestation led to a twofold increase in ketonuria, but this was not seen with a 33% calorie-restricted diet (1600 kcal/day).
“Studies by Knopp RH et al. [72] showed that a 50% calorie restriction in women with GDM at 30–33 weeks gestation led to a twofold increase in ketonuria, but this was not seen with a 33% calorie-restricted diet (1600 kcal/day).”
From Medical Nutrition Therapy for Women with Gestational Diabetes: Current Practice and Future Perspectives (2025) · cites this paper as [72]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Risks and Management during and after Pregnancy
Buchanan, T. A., Xiang, A. H., & Page, K. A. (2012) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2012.96 · Cited by 718 · see citing works
Prevention of gestational diabetes mellitus: a review of studies on weight management
Morisset, A., St‐Yves, A., Veillette, J., Weisnagel, S. J., Tchernof, A., & Robitaille, J. (2010) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.1053 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Medical Nutrition Therapy and Lifestyle Interventions
Reader, D. M. (2007) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc07-s214 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Gestational diabetes and nutritional recommendations
Gunderson, E. P. (2004) · Current Diabetes Reports · doi:10.1007/s11892-004-0041-5 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Cheong, L., Law, L. S.-C., Tan, L. Y. L., Amal, A. A.-A., Khoo, C. M., & Eng, P. C. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17071210 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
- Authors
- Knopp, R. H., Magee, M. S., Raisys, V., & Benedetti, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1991-12-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- Supplement_2
- Pages
- 165-171
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W2124392178
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK-35816, DK-17047, P30DK035816, P30DK017047)
- National Center for Research Resources (MO1-RR-0037)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
- Keywords
- gestational diabetes mellitus, hypocaloric diet, caloric restriction, insulin therapy, NPH insulin, ketonuria, plasma triglycerides, glycemic control, macrosomia, maternal obesity, intermediary metabolism, birth weight
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Blood Glucose, Energy Intake, Diabetes Mellitus, Diet, Diabetic, Diet, Reducing, Female, Glucose, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Insulin, Lipids, Liver, Maternal-Fetal Exchange, Models, Biological, Obesity, Pregnancy, Reference Values, Diabetes, Gestational
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review