Differentiating Glucose Toxicity From Glucose Desensitization: A New Message From the Insulin Gene
Abstract
Our perspective is that the concepts of glucose toxicity and glucose desensitization should be differentiated because they carry very different connotations. The term glucose desensitization most properly refers to a pharmacological event involving a temporary, readily induced, physiological and reversible state of cellular refractoriness because of repeated or prolonged exposure to high concentrations of glucose. The term glucose toxicity should be reserved for nonphysiological, irreversible alterations in cellular function caused by chronic exposure to high glucose concentrations. With regard to the pancreatic islet β-cell, the mechanism of action for glucose desensitization seems most likely to be expressed at the level of the insulin exocytotic apparatus or insulin stores within the β-cell, whereas the mechanism of action for glucose toxicity may be at the level of insulin gene transcription. This differentiation raises the possibility that exposure of patients to chronic hyperglycemia may cause glucose toxic effects on the process of insulin gene transcription and/or expression that are irreversible. If so, this may contribute to so-called secondary drug failure and, in any event, reemphasizes the need to intensify therapeutic efforts to better regulate glycemia in type II diabetes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Glucose is itself injurious in patients with Type 2 diabetes, an effect referred to as glucose toxicity or glucose desensitization.
“The primary metabolic variable glucose, is itself injurious in patients with Type 2 diabetes. This deleterious effect is often referred to as 'glucose toxicity' or 'glucose desensitization' [138, 139].”
From The relative contributions of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction to the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes (2003) · cites this paper as [139]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 12 · Cited by 185
- Authors
- Robertson, R. P., Olson, L. K., & Zhang, H.-J.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1994-09-01
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1085-1089
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W2014541875
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 12
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 11.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5f32dk008742-02)
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (5F32-DK-08742, R0I-DK-38325)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- glucotoxicity, insulin gene transcription, pancreatic beta cells, chronic hyperglycemia, insulin exocytosis, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Base Sequence, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Exocytosis, Glucose, Humans, Insulin, Islets of Langerhans, Molecular Sequence Data, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Transcription, Genetic, Gene Expression
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review