Cited by 185Pancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and Research

Differentiating Glucose Toxicity From Glucose Desensitization: A New Message From the Insulin Gene

Robertson, R Paul, Olson, L Karl, Zhang, Hui-Jian·1994·Diabetes

Abstract

Our perspective is that the concepts of glucose toxicity and glucose desensitization should be differentiated because they carry very different connotations. The term glucose desensitization most properly refers to a pharmacological event involving a temporary, readily induced, physiological and reversible state of cellular refractoriness because of repeated or prolonged exposure to high concentrations of glucose. The term glucose toxicity should be reserved for nonphysiological, irreversible alterations in cellular function caused by chronic exposure to high glucose concentrations. With regard to the pancreatic islet β-cell, the mechanism of action for glucose desensitization seems most likely to be expressed at the level of the insulin exocytotic apparatus or insulin stores within the β-cell, whereas the mechanism of action for glucose toxicity may be at the level of insulin gene transcription. This differentiation raises the possibility that exposure of patients to chronic hyperglycemia may cause glucose toxic effects on the process of insulin gene transcription and/or expression that are irreversible. If so, this may contribute to so-called secondary drug failure and, in any event, reemphasizes the need to intensify therapeutic efforts to better regulate glycemia in type II diabetes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diab.43.9.1085

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 12 · Cited by 185

Authors
Robertson, R. P., Olson, L. K., & Zhang, H.-J.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
Diabetes
Published
1994-09-01
Volume
43
Issue
9
Pages
1085-1089
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2014541875
Cited by
185
References
12
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
FWCI
11.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5f32dk008742-02)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (5F32-DK-08742, R0I-DK-38325)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
glucotoxicity, insulin gene transcription, pancreatic beta cells, chronic hyperglycemia, insulin exocytosis, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Enhancer Elements, Genetic, Exocytosis, Glucose, Humans, Insulin, Islets of Langerhans, Molecular Sequence Data, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Transcription, Genetic, Gene Expression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review