Effects of a 48-h Fat Infusion on Insulin Secretion and Glucose Utilization
Abstract
To determine the effects of prolonged elevation of plasma free fatty acids (FFAs) on insulin secretion, we infused Liposyn II (4.3 μmol · kg−1 · min−1) plus heparin (0.4 U · kg−1 · min−1) intravenously into six healthy volunteers for 48 h. Another six volunteers received saline infusions and served as control subjects. In all 12 subjects (11 men and 1 woman), plasma glucose was clamped at ∼8.6 mmol/l. Liposyn/heparin infusion resulted in a 9.4-fold increase in plasma FFA concentration (from 132 to 1,237 μmol/l), a 46% increase in insulin secretion rates (from 241 to 352 pmol/min, P < 0.05) (determined by deconvolution of plasma C-peptide concentration), and a 30% decrease, during the initial 24 h, in the rate of glucose infusion needed to maintain hyperglycemia (from 55.5 to 39.1 μmol · kg−1 · min−1, P < 0.02). This decrease disappeared during the second 24 h. In summary, we found that physiologically elevated plasma FFAs 1) potentiated glucose-stimulated insulin secretion for 48 h and 2) initially caused peripheral insulin resistance that disappeared during the 2nd day, probably as a result of elevated circulating insulin levels. We conclude that in healthy volunteers under hyperglycemic conditions, fat infusion produced insulin resistance that was compensated for after ∼24 h by persistent hypersecretion of insulin.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Increased NEFA seem to inhibit beta-cell function in vivo.
“Thus, increased NEFA seem to inhibit beta-cell function in vivo.”
From The relative contributions of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction to the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes (2003) · cites this paper as [152]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 271
- Authors
- Boden, G., Chen, X., Rosner, J., & Barton, M.
- Affiliations
- Temple University (US)
- ORCID
- Chen, Xinhua
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1995-10-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1239-1242
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W2162261303
- Cited by
- 271
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 4.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5r01ag007988-10, 5r01aa010221-03)
- National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R01-AA-10221)
- National Institute on Aging (R01-AG07988)
- National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000349, RR-00349)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- free fatty acids, fat infusion, insulin secretion, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, insulin resistance, glucose utilization, hyperglycemic clamp, C-peptide, heparin, hyperinsulinemia
- MeSH terms
- Insulin Secretion, Adult, Blood Glucose, Emulsions, Fat Emulsions, Intravenous, Fatty Acids, Nonesterified, Female, Glucose, Heparin, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Insulin, Kinetics, Male, Phospholipids, Reference Values, Safflower Oil, Soybean Oil, Time Factors, Glucose Clamp Technique, Body Mass Index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review