Cited by 182Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesBlood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies

Long-term effect of lisinopril and atenolol on kidney function in hypertensive NIDDM subjects with diabetic nephropathy

Nielsen, F. S., Rossing, P., Gall, M. A., Skott, P., Smidt, U. M., Parving, H. H.·1997·Diabetes

Abstract

The aim of our study was to evaluate whether inhibition of ACE (lisinopril 10-20 mg/day) can reduce the rate of decline in kidney function more than reducing blood pressure with conventional antihypertensive treatment (atenolol 50-100 mg/day), usually in combination with a diuretic. We performed a prospective, randomized, parallel study for 42 months, double blind for the first 12 months and single blind thereafter. Forty-three (21 lisinopril and 22 atenolol) hypertensive NIDDM patients with diabetic nephropathy were enrolled. Data from 36 patients (17 lisinopril and 19 atenolol, 60 +/- 7 years of age, 27 men) who completed at least 12 months of the study period are presented. At baseline, the two groups were comparable: glomerular filtration rate (51Cr-EDTA plasma clearance) was 75 +/- 6 and 74 +/- 8 ml x min(-1) x 1.73 m(-2), mean 24-h ambulatory blood pressure (A&D TM2420) was 110 +/- 3 and 114 +/- 2 mmHg, and 24-h urinary albumin excretion rate was 961 (range 331-5,727) and 1,578 (476-5,806) mg/24 h in the lisinopril and atenolol groups, respectively. The mean follow-up time was similar, 37 and 35 months in the lisinopril and atenolol groups, respectively. Mean ambulatory blood pressure was equally reduced in the two groups, 12 +/- 2 and 10 +/- 2 mmHg in the lisinopril and atenolol groups, respectively. Glomerular filtration rate declined in a biphasic manner with a faster initial (0 to 6 months) change of 1.25 +/- 0.49 and 0.81 +/- 0.29 ml x min(-1) x month(-1) followed…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diabetes.46.7.1182

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies involving angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitors demonstrated beneficial effects on proteinuria but did not demonstrate the superiority of renin-angiotensin system blockade in slowing progression to end-stage renal disease over nonblockade forms of therapy.

    “Previous studies involving angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitors have demonstrated beneficial effects on proteinuria but have not demonstrated the superiority of blockade of the renin-angiotensin system in slowing the progression to end-stage renal disease over nonblockade forms of therapy. 14-20”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nielsen, F. S., Rossing, P., Gall, M. A., Skott, P., Smidt, U. M., & Parving, H. H.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
1997-07-01
Volume
46
Issue
7
Pages
1182-1188
ISSN
0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1966972471
Cited by
182
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
13.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ipsen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Keywords
lisinopril, atenolol, diabetic nephropathy, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, glomerular filtration rate decline, albuminuria, ambulatory blood pressure, antihypertensive therapy, renal function preservation, long-term follow-up, diuretics, 51Cr-EDTA clearance, urinary albumin
MeSH terms
Aged, Albuminuria, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Animals, Antihypertensive Agents, Atenolol, Blood Pressure, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Nephropathies, Double-Blind Method, Follow-Up Studies, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Humans, Hypertension, Renal, Kidney, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Rabbits, Time Factors, Single-Blind Method, Lisinopril

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review