Cited by 431Pancreatic function and diabetesTransplantation: Methods and OutcomesDiabetes and associated disorders

Incompatibility between human blood and isolated islets of Langerhans: a finding with implications for clinical intraportal islet transplantation?

Bennet, W, Sundberg, B, Groth, C G, Brendel, M D, Brandhorst, D, Brandhorst, H, Bretzel, R G, Elgue, G +3 more·1999·Diabetes

Abstract

The remarkable difference in success rates between clinical pancreas transplantation and islet transplantation is poorly understood. Despite the same histocompatibility barrier and similar immunosuppressive treatments in both transplantation procedures, human intraportal islet transplantation has a much inferior success rate than does vascularized pancreas transplantation. Thus far, little attention has been directed to the possibility that islets transplanted into the blood stream may elicit an injurious incompatibility reaction. We have tested this hypothesis in vitro with human islets and in vivo with porcine islets. Human islets were exposed to nonanticoagulated human ABO-compatible blood in surface-heparinized polyvinyl chloride tubing loops. Heparin and/or the soluble complement receptor 1 (sCR1) TP10 were tested as additives. Adult porcine islets were transplanted intraportally into pigs, and the liver was recovered after 60 min for immunohistochemical staining. Human islets induced a rapid consumption and activation of platelets. Neutrophils and monocytes were also consumed, and the coagulation and complement systems were activated. Upon histological examination, islets were found to be embedded in clots and infiltrated with CD11+ leukocytes. Furthermore, the cellular morphology was disrupted. When heparin and sCR1 were added to the blood, these events were avoided. Porcine islets retrieved in liver biopsies after intraportal islet allotransplantation showed a morphol…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diabetes.48.10.1907

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 431

Authors
Bennet, W., Sundberg, B., Groth, C. G., Brendel, M. D., Brandhorst, D., Brandhorst, H., Bretzel, R. G., Elgue, G., Larsson, R., Nilsson, B., & Korsgren, O.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
Diabetes
Published
1999-10-01
Volume
48
Issue
10
Pages
1907-1914
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2066808970
Cited by
431
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 17
FWCI
8.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
islet transplantation, intraportal islet transplantation, islet damage, platelet activation, neutrophil activation, monocyte activation, coagulation activation, complement activation, soluble complement receptor 1, heparin, porcine islets, allogeneic islet transplantation
MeSH terms
Adult, Animals, Blood, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Humans, Inflammation, Insulin, Islets of Langerhans, Leukocyte Count, Male, Middle Aged, Platelet Count, Portal Vein, Rabbits, Swine, Islets of Langerhans Transplantation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review