Cited by 72Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsPancreatic function and diabetesDiabetes Management and Research

Dysregulation of the insulin/IGF binding protein-1 axis in transgenic mice is associated with hyperinsulinemia and glucose intolerance.

Crossey, P A, Jones, J S, Miell, J P·2000·Diabetes

Abstract

The insulin/IGF binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) axis is important in coordinating insulin- and IGF-mediated regulation of glucose metabolism and glycemia. Dysregulation of the axis may play a role in the pathophysiology of disorders of insulin deficiency and resistance. We have investigated this hypothesis by generating transgenic mice that overexpress hIGFBP-1. To study the axis in its true physiological context, we used a human (h) IGFBP-1 cosmid clone so that transgene expression is responsive to normal hormonal stimuli. hIGFBP-1 mRNA is expressed in a tissue-specific fashion, and measurement of serum protein levels by specific immunoassay indicates normal physiological regulation in response to fasting/feeding and appropriate post-translational modification as indicated by the detection of phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated isoforms of the protein. The hypoglycemic response to exogenous IGF-I is attenuated in transgenic mice. Transgenic mice exhibit an enhanced insulin secretory response to a glucose challenge, although basal and stimulated blood glucose levels are similar to controls. There is a sexual dimorphism in phenotypic expression: male transgenic mice had higher stimulated glucose and insulin levels than did females. Transgenic mice exhibit fasting hyperglycemia and hyperinsulinemia and glucose intolerance in later life, indicating an age-related decline in glucocompetence. These findings demonstrate the importance of the normal inverse relationship between serum i…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diabetes.49.3.457

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 13 · Cited by 72

Authors
Crossey, P. A., Jones, J. S., & Miell, J. P.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2000-03-01
Volume
49
Issue
3
Pages
457-465
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2142531099
Cited by
72
References
13
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
hyperinsulinemia, impaired glucose tolerance, hyperglycemia, insulin secretion, insulin-like growth factor I, glucose regulation, insulin resistance, sexual dimorphism, aging, transgenic mice, post-translational modification, hypoglycemic response
MeSH terms
Aging, Animals, Blood Glucose, Body Weight, Female, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Hyperinsulinism, Insulin, Insulin-Like Growth Factor I, Male, Mice, Transgenic, RNA, Messenger, Sex Characteristics, Glucose Intolerance, Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 1, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review