Cited by 103Pancreatic function and diabetesIon channel regulation and functionDiabetes Treatment and Management

Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Activation Antagonizes Voltage-Dependent Repolarizing K+ Currents in β-Cells

MacDonald, Patrick E., Salapatek, Anne Marie F., Wheeler, Michael B.·2002·Diabetes

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) acts through its G-protein-coupled receptor to enhance glucose-stimulated insulin secretion from pancreatic beta-cells. This is believed to result from modulation of at least two ion channels: ATP-sensitive K(+) (K(ATP)) channels and voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channels. Here, we report that GLP-1 receptor signaling also regulates the activity of beta-cell voltage-dependent K(+) (K(V)) channels, themselves potent glucose-dependent regulators of insulin secretion. GLP-1 receptor activation with exendin 4 (10(-8) mol/l) in rat beta-cells antagonized K(V) currents by 43.3 +/- 6.3%, whereas the GLP-1 receptor antagonist exendin 9-39 had no effect. The effect of GLP-1 receptor activation on K(V) currents could be replicated (current reduction of 55.7 +/- 6.0%) by G-protein activation with GMP-PNP (10 nmol/l). The cAMP pathway antagonist Rp-cAMPS (100 micro mol/l) prevented current inhibition by exendin 4, implicating cAMP signaling in GLP-1 receptor modulation of beta-cell K(V) currents. Finally, exendin 4 (10(-8) mol/l) increased the amplitude (130 +/- 5.7%) and duration (285 +/- 15.9%) of the beta-cell depolarization response to current injection, independent of any effect on K(ATP) or Ca(2+) channels. The present results demonstrate that GLP-1 receptor signaling can antagonize beta-cell repolarization by reducing voltage-dependent K(+) currents, an effect likely to contribute to GLP-1's glucose-dependent insulinotropic effect.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diabetes.51.2007.s443

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Syntaxin-1 and SNAP25 both shift the voltage dependence of Kv2.1 inactivation, in opposite directions.

    “For example, syntaxin-1 and SNAP25 both shift the voltage dependence of inactivation, albeit in opposite directions (syntaxin shifts it negative and SNAP25 positive) (413, 448).”
  • cAMP, via PKA activation, reduces the magnitude of the delayed rectifying K+ current in β-cells.

    “For example, cAMP (via PKA activation) reduces the magnitude of the delayed rectifying current (413).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacDonald, P. E., Salapatek, A. M. F., & Wheeler, M. B.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2002-12-01
Volume
51
Issue
suppl_3
Pages
S443-S447
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2147823258
Cited by
103
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
GLP-1 receptor, voltage-gated potassium channels, exendin-4, exendin-9-39, cAMP signaling, glucose-stimulated insulin secretion, G protein signaling, pancreatic beta cells
MeSH terms
Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor, Cyclic AMP, Animals, Electric Conductivity, Islets of Langerhans, Male, Signal Transduction, Rats, Wistar, Receptors, Glucagon, Potassium Channels, Voltage-Gated, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review