Impaired Postprandial Adipose Tissue Blood Flow Response Is Related to Aspects of Insulin Sensitivity
Abstract
Obesity has been associated with dysfunctional postprandial adipose tissue blood flow (ATBF), but it has also been recognized that the interindividual response is highly variable. The present work aimed at characterizing this variability. Fifteen subjects were given 75 g oral glucose, and abdominal subcutaneous ATBF was monitored by the 133Xe washout method. Determinants of insulin sensitivity based on nonesterified fatty acid (NEFA) suppression after oral glucose administration [ISI(NEFA)] were higher in the top tertile ATBF response group (1.29 ± 0.09 vs. 0.90 ± 0.08 in the lower tertiles, P = 0.01). ISI(NEFA) was related to ATBF response (rs = 0.73, P < 0.002) as well as insulin sensitivity based on postprandial glycemia [ISI(gly), rs = 0.58, P < 0.05], whereas the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index (rs = −0.39, P = 0.16) was not. The relationship between increase in ATBF and ISI(NEFA) was independent of BMI (P = 0.015) in multivariate analysis. Subjects with a high ATBF response had significantly higher increase of plasma norepinephrine (P < 0.05), indicating a link between postprandial insulinemia, sympathetic activation, and ATBF response. There is a close relationship between insulin sensitivity and the regulation of postprandial ATBF, independent of adiposity. Impaired regulation of ATBF seems to be another facet of the insulin resistance syndrome.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The postprandial increase in blood flow that is so frequently observed in lean individuals is dramatically reduced in obese individuals.
“the postprandial increase in blood flow that is so frequently observed in lean individuals is dramatically reduced in obese individuals (95,96)”
From Adipose tissue remodeling and obesity (2011) · cites this paper as [96]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 30 · Cited by 177
- Authors
- Karpe, F., Fielding, B. A., Ilic, V., Macdonald, I. A., Summers, L. K. M., & Frayn, K. N.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- University of Nottingham (GB)
- Venue
- Diabetes
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2002-08-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2467-2473
- ISSN
- 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-327X
- OpenAlex
- W2104540429
- Semantic Scholar
- 7ab1853993fa414ac2305f20a504205bce8c9d73
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 30
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 5.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Adipokines, Inflammation, and Metabolic Diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Keywords
- insulin sensitivity, metabolic syndrome, free fatty acids, oral glucose tolerance, norepinephrine, sympathetic activation, interindividual variability, subcutaneous adipose tissue, HOMA index, plasma insulin
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Administration, Oral, Adult, Blood Flow Velocity, Blood Glucose, Fatty Acids, Nonesterified, Female, Glucose, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Infusions, Intravenous, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Regional Blood Flow, Postprandial Period
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review