Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Survival Benefits of Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critical Illness

Ellger, Björn, Debaveye, Yves, Vanhorebeek, Ilse, Langouche, Lies, Giulietti, Annapaula, Van Etten, Evelyne, Herijgers, Paul, Mathieu, Chantal, Van den Berghe, Greet·2006·Diabetes

Abstract

Tight blood glucose control with insulin reduces morbidity and mortality of critically ill patients. However, the relative impact of maintaining normoglycemia and of glycemia-independent actions of insulin remains unknown. We therefore independently manipulated blood glucose and plasma insulin levels in burn-injured, parentally fed rabbits over 7 days to obtain four study groups: two normoglycemic groups with either normal or elevated insulin levels and two hyperglycemic groups with either normal or elevated insulin levels. We studied the relative impact of glycemia and glycemia-independent effects of insulin on survival; myocardial contractility in an open chest preparation; endothelial function in isolated aortic rings; and liver, kidney, and leukocyte function in a rabbit model of critical illness. Mortality was significantly lower in the two normoglycemic groups independent of insulin levels. Maintaining normoglycemia, independent of insulin levels, prevented endothelial dysfunction as well as liver and kidney injury. To increase myocardial systolic function, elevated insulin levels and prevention of hyperglycemia were required concomitantly. Leukocyte dysfunction was present in the two hyperglycemic groups, which could in part be rescued by insulin. The results suggest that the observed benefits of intensive insulin therapy required mainly maintenance of normoglycemia; whereas glycemia-independent actions of insulin exerted only minor, organ-specific impact.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diabetes.55.04.06.db05-1434

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Ellger, B., Debaveye, Y., Vanhorebeek, I., Langouche, L., Giulietti, A., Van Etten, E., Herijgers, P., Mathieu, C., & Van den Berghe, G.
Venue
Diabetes
Published
2006-04-01
Volume
55
Issue
4
Pages
1096-1105
ISSN
  • 0012-1797 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-327X
OpenAlex
W2150481072
Cited by
221
References
2
FWCI
23.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survival Benefits of Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critical Illness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diabetes.55.04.06.db05-1434
The paper
Ellger, B., Debaveye, Y., Vanhorebeek, I., Langouche, L., Giulietti, A., Van Etten, E., Herijgers, P., Mathieu, C., & Van den Berghe, G. (2006). Survival Benefits of Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critical Illness. Diabetes. https://doi.org/10.2337/diabetes.55.04.06.db05-1434

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.