Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 479

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT): Results of Feasibility Study. The DCCT Research Group

·1987·Diabetes Care

Abstract

The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) is a multicenter, randomized, clinical study designed to determine whether an intensive treatment regimen directed at maintaining blood glucose concentrations as close to normal as possible will affect the appearance or progression of early vascular complications in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). We present the baseline characteristics and 1-yr results of the initial cohort of 278 subjects randomized in phase II of the trial, a phase designed to answer several feasibility questions before initiating a full-scale trial. During phase II, recruitment was completed on schedule. The 191 adults and 87 adolescents were randomized either to standard treatment (90 adults and 42 adolescents), designed to approximate conventional diabetes treatment, or to experimental treatment (101 adults and 45 adolescents), designed to achieve near-normal blood glucose and HbA1c concentrations. With few exceptions, baseline demographic, ophthalmologic, renal, and other medical characteristics were evenly distributed by randomization between the two treatment groups in both age strata. Glycemic control at baseline, as assessed by HbA1c concentrations and by blood glucose profiles, was comparable between the treatment groups in both age strata. The treatment strategies employed produced statistically significant and clinically meaningful differences in HbA1c concentrations and blood glucose profiles between the experimental- and standard-group subjects for both adults and adolescents. These differences were maintained throughout the feasibility phase. Except for an increased incidence of hypoglycemia in the experimental group, the two treatment regimens maintained or improved the clinical well-being of subjects in both groups. Adherence and completeness of follow-up were excellent (>95%), and the methods employed to measure biochemical and pathologic characteristics of IDDM proved to be reliable, reproducible, and precise. The feasibility phase of the DCCT demonstrated that a complex multicenter, randomized study of the relationship between diabetes control and complications can be performed. The full-scale, long-term trial therefore has been initiated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.10.1.1

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
1987-01-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
1-19
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W4242053217
Cited by
479
References
0
FWCI
25.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT): Results of Feasibility Study. The DCCT Research Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.10.1.1
The paper
Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT): Results of Feasibility Study. The DCCT Research Group. (1987). Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.10.1.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.