The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevalence of Glucose Intolerance in Asian Indians: Urban-rural difference and significance of upper body adiposity
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of NIDDM and IGT in the urban and rural areas in southern India. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Two populations of the same ethnic background, but different socioeconomic background were chosen for this study. Nine-hundred urban people and 1038 rural subjects were studied. Fasting and 2-h post-glucose capillary blood samples after a 75 g oral glucose load (WHO criteria) were obtained in these randomly selected adults (≥ 20 yr of age). RESULTS: Using the WHO criteria, the prevalence of NIDDM, adjusted to the age of the respective general population, was 8.2% in the urban and 2.4% in the rural populations. The prevalence was 8.4 and 7.9%, respectively, in urban men and women, and 2.6 and 1.6% in rural men and women. The age-adjusted prevalence of IGT was 8.7 and 7.8% in the urban and rural areas, respectively. The prevalence of IGT was 8.8% in urban men and 8.3% in women; the corresponding values for rural men and women were 8.7 and 6.4%. The prevalence of NIDDM increased with age, markedly so in the urban people. The urban-rural difference was significant for NIDDM (X2 = 29.4, P < 0.001) but not for IGT. In the urban population, 65% of the NIDDM patients were known cases, whereas in the rural area, the known cases accounted for only 24%. Bivariate analysis showed an association of BMI, STR, and WHR with prevalence of NIDDM plus IGT. In the multiple logistic regression analysis, age, BMI, STR, and WHR were associated significantly with glucose intolerance in the urban population, whereas only age was significant in the rural population. The best predictors of NIDDM were age, BMI, WHR, and urbanization. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed a high prevalence of NIDDM in the urban southern Indian population. The prevalence of NIDDM in the same ethnic group in rural areas was significantly lower. The prevalence of IGT was similar in both populations. Upper body adiposity was a significant predictor of NIDDM in this population with low rates of obesity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Epidemic obesity and type 2 diabetes in Asia
Yoon, K.-H., Lee, J.-H., Kim, J.-W., Cho, J. H., Choi, Y.-H., Ko, S.-H., Zimmet, P., & Son, H.-Y. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)69703-1 · Cited by 1,580
Yusuf, S., Reddy, S., Ôunpuu, S., & Anand, S. (2001) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/hc4701.099488 · Cited by 1,141
Ramachandran, A., Wan Ma, R. C., & Snehalatha, C. (2010) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60937-5 · Cited by 782
Self-citationTrends in prevalence of diabetes in Asian countries
Ramachandran, A. (2012) · World Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.4239/wjd.v3.i6.110 · Cited by 561
Self-citationCutoff Values for Normal Anthropometric Variables in Asian Indian Adults
Snehalatha, C., Viswanathan, V., & Ramachandran, A. (2003) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.5.1380 · Cited by 543
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ramachandran, A., Snehalatha, C., Dharmaraj, D., & Viswanathan, M.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1992-10-01
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1348-1355
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2107535142
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of Glucose Intolerance in Asian Indians: Urban-rural difference and significance of upper body adiposity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.15.10.1348
- The paper
- Ramachandran, A., Snehalatha, C., Dharmaraj, D., & Viswanathan, M. (1992). Prevalence of Glucose Intolerance in Asian Indians: Urban-rural difference and significance of upper body adiposity. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.15.10.1348
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.