The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Global Estimates for Prevalence of Diabetes Mellitus and Impaired Glucose Tolerance in Adults
Abstract
Objective— To assemble standardized estimates of abnormal glucose tolerance in adults in diverse communities worldwide and provide guidelines for the derivation of comparable estimates in future epidemiological studies. Research Design and Methods— The project was limited to population-based investigations that had used current WHO criteria for diagnosis and classification of abnormal glucose tolerance. Raw data were obtained by WHO from surveys conducted during 1976–1991 of over 150,000 persons from 75 communities in 32 countries. Data within the truncated age range of 30–64 yr were adjusted to the standard world population of Segi. Age-specific prevalences also are reported for selected populations. Results— Within the chosen age range, diabetes was absent or rare (<3%) in some traditional communities in developing countries. In European populations, age-standardized prevalence varied from 3 to 10%. Some Arab, migrant Asian Indian, Chinese, and Hispanic American populations were at higher risk with prevalences of 14–20%. The highest prevalences were found in the Nauruans (41%) and the Pima/Papago Indians (50%). Age-standardized prevalence of IGT was low (<3%) in some Chinese, traditional American Indian, and Pacific island populations. Moderate (3–10%) or high (11–20%) prevalences of IGT were observed in many populations worldwide. The highest estimates for prevalence of IGT were seen in female Muslim Asian Indians in Tanzania (32%) and in urban male Micronesians in Kiribati (28%). Prevalence of diabetes rose with age in all populations in which age-specific data were examined. This trend was most pronounced in those at moderate to high risk. The ratio of prevalence of diabetes in men versus women varied markedly between populations with little discernable trend, although IGT was generally more common in women. In most communities, at least 20% of diabetes cases were unknown before the survey, and in many communities, >50% were previously undiagnosed. In both Chinese and Indian migrant populations, relative prevalence was high when compared with indigenous communities. Conclusions— Diabetes in adults is now a global health problem, and populations of developing countries, minority groups, and disadvantaged communities in industrialized countries now face the greatest risk.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is strongly associated with obesity in most, but not all, ethnic groups, suggesting important ethnic differences in disease susceptibility.”
From Increased prevalence of insulin resistance and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Asian-Indian men (2006) · cites this paper as [5]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wild, S., Roglic, G., Green, A., Sicree, R., & King, H. (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.5.1047 · Cited by 15,297
“rural areas was assumed to be one-half that of urban areas, based on the ratio observed in a number of population studies and as used in previous estimates (1).”
ResultSelf-citationGlobal estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2010 and 2030
Shaw, J. E., Sicree, R. A., & Zimmet, P. Z. (2010) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2009.10.007 · Cited by 7,216
IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040
Ogurtsova, K., Fernandes, J. D. D. R., Huang, Y., Linnenkamp, U., Guariguata, L., Cho, N. H., Cavan, D. A., Shaw, J. E., & Makaroff, L. (2017) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.024 · Cited by 7,121
“of persons with diabetes [1–4] and recently the Global Burden of Disease project published estimates for the years 1980 and 2008 using a complex multi-level approach [5].”
BackgroundIDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of the prevalence of diabetes for 2011 and 2030
Whiting, D. R., Guariguata, L., Weil, C., & Shaw, J. E. (2011) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2011.10.029 · Cited by 4,018
Amos, A., Mccarty, D. J., & Zimmet, P. (1997) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9136(199712)14:5+ · Cited by 2,247
Metadata
- Authors
- King, H., Rewers, M., & Who Ad Hoc Diabetes Reporting Group
- Affiliations
- World Health Organization (CH)
- ORCID
- Rewers, Marian
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1993-01-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 157-177
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2163949492
- Cited by
- 886
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 32
- FWCI
- 19.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- STM:n Hallinnonalan avoin julkaisuarkisto (Julkari) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK030747, DK 30747)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Epidemiology
- Keywords
- diabetes mellitus, impaired glucose tolerance, diabetes prevalence, global prevalence estimates, age-standardized prevalence, sex differences in diabetes, undiagnosed diabetes, migrants, ethnic groups, traditional communities, Asian Indians, Micronesian population
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Biometry, Diabetes Mellitus, Ethnicity, Female, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Male, Middle Aged, Prevalence, Racial Groups
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review