The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Immunogenicity and Allergenic Potential of Animal and Human Insulins
Abstract
Immunological complications of insulin therapy have been evident since animal insulins became available for the treatment of diabetes mellitus in 1922. Insulin allergy has been particularly common, with local symptoms still occurring in ∼ 5% of all patients. Insulin antibodies of high titers were observed in many patients treated with early insulin preparations containing proinsulin, C-peptide, and other peptide contaminants. Immunoglobulin G-insulin antibodies of very high levels can lead to immune-mediated insulin resistance, which is now extremely rare because of the widespread use of highly purified porcine insulin and human insulin preparations. Lipoatrophy, which was reported in 10–55% of patients treated with nonpurified bovine/porcine insulin preparations, has almost disappeared in patients since the advent of exclusive human insulin treatment. In view of the wide spectrum of immune-mediated complications of insulin therapy, much attention has been directed to the reduced immunogenicity and allergenicity of highly purified porcine insulins and the more recently available recombinant and semisynthetic human insulin preparations. Insulin antibodies of the immunoglobulin G and immunoglobulin E type can develop, however, in very low titers in patients treated exclusively with human insulin. Frequency and levels of immunoglobulin G insulin antibodies are identical in patients treated either with biosynthetic or semisynthetic human insulin preparations. Allergic symptoms to human insulin are now found in < 1% of de novo-treated patients, but still may occur when human insulin is used in the insulin-allergic patient. In summary, immunological complications of insulin therapy have decreased significantly during the last two decades and are now predominantly observed in patients with interrupted insulin therapy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Human Anti-Animal Antibody Interferences in Immunological Assays
Kricka, L. J. (1999) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1093/clinchem/45.7.942 · Cited by 586
The evolution of insulin and how it informs therapy and treatment choices
Hirsch, I. B., Juneja, R., Beals, J. M., Antalis, C. J., & Wright, E. E. (2020) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/endrev/bnaa015 · Cited by 237
Eon‐Duval, A., Broly, H., & Gleixner, R. (2012) · Biotechnology Progress · doi:10.1002/btpr.1548 · Cited by 234
Peripartum management of glycemia in women with type 1 diabetes
Achong, N., Duncan, E. L., McIntyre, H. D., & Callaway, L. (2014) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc13-1348 · Cited by 53
Burge, M. R., & Schade, D. S. (1997) · Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/s0889-8529(05)70268-1 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Schernthaner, G.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1993-12-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- Supplement_3
- Pages
- 155-165
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2145962271
- Cited by
- 247
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Immunogenicity and Allergenic Potential of Animal and Human Insulins. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.16.3.155
- The paper
- Schernthaner, G. (1993). Immunogenicity and Allergenic Potential of Animal and Human Insulins. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.16.3.155
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.