Cited by 64Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and Research

Long-term comparison of three dietary prescriptions in the treatment of NIDDM

Milne, Robyn M, Mann, Jim I, Chisholm, Alex W, Williams, Sheila M·1994·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare three sets of dietary guidelines for the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM) in free-living individuals and to observe the effects on metabolic control over an 18-month period. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Seventy volunteer subjects with NIDDM were randomly assigned to one of three diets, a weight-management diet, a high-carbohydrate/fiber diet, or a modified-lipid diet and followed for 18 months. Nutrient intakes, weight, blood lipids, and glycemic control were measured. RESULTS: In all diet groups, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1) fell significantly before diet intervention began, remaining lower throughout the study and at follow-up 9 months later. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol showed a sustained fall in all groups after diet intervention. Apart from transient changes in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and triglyceride (TG) in the diet groups with the higher carbohydrate intake, no lasting differences were found between the three diet groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the long term, there were few differences in the outcome of the three dietary prescriptions. Even with intensive instruction, participants found it difficult to meet recommended nutrient intakes; however, specific dietary advice did result in an improvement in LDL cholesterol. Adverse changes in HDL cholesteroland TG because of diet intervention were transient. The significant improvement in glycemic control during the recruitment phase may have been the result of particpants' previous dietary knowledge and the increased attention that they received during the intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.17.1.74

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies comparing a high-carbohydrate diet with a high-MUFA diet and a high-fiber diet with a low-fat diet showed no significant differences in weight, glycemic control, and lipid profile.

    “The studies that compared a diet high in carbohydrates to one high in MUFAs and high-fiber with low-fat diets showed no significant differences in weight, glycemic control, and lipid profile (5,28).”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

Cited by 64

Authors
Milne, R. M., Mann, J. I., Chisholm, A. W., & Williams, S. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Department of Human Nutrition, University of Otago Dunedin, New Zealand
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
1994-01-01
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
74-80
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W1997177451
Cited by
64
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, dietary intervention, glycemic control, HbA1c, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, high-carbohydrate diet, high-fiber diet, nutrient intake
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Blood Glucose, Body Weight, Cholesterol, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Diabetic, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Dietary Fiber, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Triglycerides

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review