Long-term comparison of three dietary prescriptions in the treatment of NIDDM
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare three sets of dietary guidelines for the treatment of non-insulin-dependent diabetes (NIDDM) in free-living individuals and to observe the effects on metabolic control over an 18-month period. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Seventy volunteer subjects with NIDDM were randomly assigned to one of three diets, a weight-management diet, a high-carbohydrate/fiber diet, or a modified-lipid diet and followed for 18 months. Nutrient intakes, weight, blood lipids, and glycemic control were measured. RESULTS: In all diet groups, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1) fell significantly before diet intervention began, remaining lower throughout the study and at follow-up 9 months later. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol showed a sustained fall in all groups after diet intervention. Apart from transient changes in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and triglyceride (TG) in the diet groups with the higher carbohydrate intake, no lasting differences were found between the three diet groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the long term, there were few differences in the outcome of the three dietary prescriptions. Even with intensive instruction, participants found it difficult to meet recommended nutrient intakes; however, specific dietary advice did result in an improvement in LDL cholesterol. Adverse changes in HDL cholesteroland TG because of diet intervention were transient. The significant improvement in glycemic control during the recruitment phase may have been the result of particpants' previous dietary knowledge and the increased attention that they received during the intervention.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies comparing a high-carbohydrate diet with a high-MUFA diet and a high-fiber diet with a low-fat diet showed no significant differences in weight, glycemic control, and lipid profile.
“The studies that compared a diet high in carbohydrates to one high in MUFAs and high-fiber with low-fat diets showed no significant differences in weight, glycemic control, and lipid profile (5,28).”
From Systematic review and meta-analysis of different dietary approaches to the management of type 2 diabetes (2013) · cites this paper as [28]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 64
- Authors
- Milne, R. M., Mann, J. I., Chisholm, A. W., & Williams, S. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Otago (NZ)
- Department of Human Nutrition, University of Otago Dunedin, New Zealand
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1994-01-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-80
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W1997177451
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 1.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, dietary intervention, glycemic control, HbA1c, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, high-carbohydrate diet, high-fiber diet, nutrient intake
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Blood Glucose, Body Weight, Cholesterol, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Diabetic, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Dietary Fiber, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors, Triglycerides
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review