The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Independent Contributions of Diabetic Neuropathy and Yasculopatny in Foot Ulceration: How great are the risks?
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe the relative contributions of neurological and vascular abnormalities to the overall risk of diabetic foot ulceration. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A case-control study of diabetic veterans from the Seattle Veterans Affairs Medical Center was conducted using data collected from 46 patients with diabetic foot ulcers and 322 control subjects. Neuropathy was determined by vibratory, monofilament, and tendon reflex testing. Macro-vascular disease was measured by ankle-arm blood pressure index, and cutaneous perfusion was measured by transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcPO2) on the dorsal foot. A multi variate logistic regression model was used to adjust for confounding variables and to calculate the odds ratios (ORs) for each independent risk factor. RESULTS: Three variables were significant independent predictors of foot ulceration: absence of Achilles tendon reflexes (adjusted OR 6.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.37–18.06), insensate to the 5.07 monofilament (adjusted OR 18.42, 95% CI 3.83–88.47), and TcPO2 <30 mmHg (adjusted OR 57.87, 95% CI 5.08–658.96). Absent vibratory sensation and low ankle-arm blood pressure index were not significant independent risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Both neuropathy and vasculopathy are strong independent risk factors for the development of diabetic foot ulcers. In our model, the strongest risk factor is impaired cutaneous oxygenation. However, in the clinical setting, sensory examination with a 5.07 monofilament probably remains the single most practical measure of risk assessment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Risk Factors for Foot Infections in Individuals With Diabetes
Lavery, L. A., Armstrong, D. G., Wunderlich, R. P., Mohler, M. J., Wendel, C. S., & Lipsky, B. A. (2006) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc05-2425 · Cited by 787
Kolluru, G. K., Bir, S. C., & Kevil, C. G. (2012) · International Journal of Vascular Medicine · doi:10.1155/2012/918267 · Cited by 720
The burden of diabetic foot ulcers
Reiber, G., Lipsky, B., & Gibbons, G. (1998) · The American Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00181-0 · Cited by 527
Self-citationPractical Criteria for Screening Patients at High Risk for Diabetic Foot Ulceration
Lavery, L. A., Armstrong, D. G., Vela, S. A., Quebedeaux, T. L., & Fleischli, J. G. (1998) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.158.2.157 · Cited by 482
Choosing a Practical Screening Instrument to Identify Patients at Risk for Diabetic Foot Ulceration
Armstrong, D. G., Lavery, L. A., Vela, S. A., Quebedeaux, T. L., & Fleischli, J. G. (1998) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.158.3.289 · Cited by 451
Metadata
- Authors
- McNeely, M. J., Boyko, E. J., Ahroni, J. H., Stensel, V. L., Reiber, G. E., Smith, D. G., & Pecoraro, R. E.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1995-02-01
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 216-219
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2050868887
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Independent Contributions of Diabetic Neuropathy and Yasculopatny in Foot Ulceration: How great are the risks? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.18.2.216
- The paper
- McNeely, M. J., Boyko, E. J., Ahroni, J. H., Stensel, V. L., Reiber, G. E., Smith, D. G., & Pecoraro, R. E. (1995). The Independent Contributions of Diabetic Neuropathy and Yasculopatny in Foot Ulceration: How great are the risks? Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.18.2.216
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.