CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 357Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study on Glycemic Control and Complications in Type II Diabetes (VA CSDM): Results of the feasibility trial

Abraira, Carlos, Colwell, John A, Nuttall, Frank Q, Sawin, Clark T, Nagel, Nancy Johnson, Comstock, John P, Emanuele, Nicholas V, Levin, Seymour R, Henderson, William, Lee, Hae Sook, VA CSDM Group·1995·Diabetes Care
DOI 10.2337/diacare.18.8.1113
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: It is not clear whether intensive pharmacological therapy can be effectively sustained in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM). The relative risks and benefits of intensive insulin therapy in NIDDM are not well defined. Accordingly, we designed a feasibility study that compared standard therapy and intensive therapy in a group of NIDDM men who required insulin due to sustained hyperglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A prospective trial was conducted in five medical centers in 153 men of 60 ± 6 years of age who had a known diagnosis of diabetes for 7.8 ± 4 years. They were randomly assigned to a standard insulin treatment group (one morning injection per day) or to an intensive therapy group designed to attain near-normal glycemia and a clinically significant separation of glycohemoglobin from the standard arm. A four-step plan was used in the intensive therapy group along with daily self-monitoring of glucose: 1) an evening insulin injection, 2) the same injection adding daytime glipizide, 3) two injections of insulin alone, and 4) multiple daily injections. Patient accrual and adherence, glycohemoglobin (HbA1c), side effects, and measurements of endpoints for a prospective long-term trial were assessed. RESULTS: Accrual goals were met, mean follow-up time was 27 months (range 18–35 months), and patients kept 98.6% of scheduled visits. After 6 months, the mean HbA1c in the intensive therapy group was at or below 7.3% and remained 2% lower than the standard group for the duration of the trial. Most of the decrease in the mean HbA1c in the intensive group was obtained by a single injection of evening intermediate insulin, alone or with daytime glipizide. By the end of the trial, 64% of the patients had advanced to two or more injections of insulin a day, aiming for normal HbA1c. However, only a small additional fall in HbA1c was attained. Severe hypoglycemia was rare (two events per 100 patients per year) and not significantly different between the groups, nor were changes in weight, blood pressure, or plasma lipids. There were 61 new cardiovascular events in 40 patients and 10 deaths (6 due to cardiovascular causes). CONCLUSIONS: Intense stepped insulin therapy in NIDDM patients who have failed glycemic control on pharmacological therapy is effective in maintaining near-normal glycemic control for > 2 years without excessive severe hypoglycemia, weight gain, hypertension, or dyslipidemia. Cardiovascular event rates are high at this stage of NIDDM. A long-term prospective trial is needed to assess the risk-benefit ratio of intensified treatment of hyperglycemia in NIDDM patients requiring insulin.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.18.8.1113

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–357 of 357

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Abraira, C., Colwell, J. A., Nuttall, F. Q., Sawin, C. T., Nagel, N. J., Comstock, J. P., Emanuele, N. V., Levin, S. R., Henderson, W., Lee, H. S., & VA CSDM Group
Affiliations
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Program Hines, Illinois
Venue
Diabetes Care
Publisher
American Diabetes Association
Published
1995-08-01
Volume
18
Issue
8
Pages
1113-1123
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
DOI
10.2337/diacare.18.8.1113
OpenAlex
W2091034695
Cited by
355
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 13
FWCI
11.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, intensive insulin therapy, glycemic control, glycohemoglobin, multiple daily insulin injections, glipizide, self-monitoring of blood glucose, hypoglycemia, diabetes complications, cardiovascular events, trial feasibility, veterans, diabetic men, medication adherence, mortality, diabetes morbidity
MeSH terms
Aged, Albuminuria, Animals, Blood Glucose, Blood Pressure, Cholesterol, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Angiopathies, Diabetic Retinopathy, Feasibility Studies, Glipizide, Glycated Hemoglobin, Hospitals, Animal, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Male, Middle Aged, Quality Control, Smoking, Time Factors, Triglycerides, United States, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Biomarkers, Body Mass Index, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review