The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prevalence of NIDDM Among Populations of the African Diaspora
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Rates of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus have risen sharply in recent years among blacks in the U.S. and the U.K. Increases in risk have likewise been observed in the island nations of the Caribbean and in urban West Africa. To date, however, no systematic comparison of the geographic variation of NIDDM among black populations has been undertaken. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In the course of an international collaborative study on cardiovascular disease, we used a standardized protocol to determine the rates of NIDDM and associated risk factors in populations of the African diaspora. Representative samples were drawn from sites in Nigeria, St. Lucia, Barbados, Jamaica, the United States, and the United Kingdom. A total of 4,823 individuals aged 25–74 years were recruited, all sites combined. RESULTS: In sharp contrast to a prevalence of 2% in Nigeria, age-adjusted prevalences of self-reported NIDDM were 9% in the Caribbean and 11% in the U.S. and the U.K. Mean BMI ranged from 22 kg/m2 among men in West Africa to 31 kg/m2 in women in the U.S. Disease prevalence across sites was essentially collinear with obesity, pointing to site differences in the balance between energy intake and expenditure as the primary determinant of differential NIDDM risk among these populations. CONCLUSIONS: In ethnic groups sharing a common genetic ancestry, these comparative data demonstrate the determining influence of changes in living conditions on the population risk of NIDDM.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cooper, R. S., Kaufman, J. S., & Ward, R. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsb022863 · Cited by 624
Self-citationGenetic research and health disparities.
Sankar, P. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.24.2985 · Cited by 319
Wolever, T. M. S., Hamad, S., Chiasson, J.-L., Josse, R. G., Leiter, L. A., Rodger, N. W., Ross, S. A., & Ryan, E. A. (1999) · Journal of the American College of Nutrition · doi:10.1080/07315724.1999.10718858 · Cited by 94
Diabetic retinopathy in a black population
Leske, M. C., Wu, S.-Y., Hyman, L., Li, X., Hennis, A., Connell, A. M. S., & Schachat, A. P. (1999) · Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(99)90398-6 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Cooper, R. S., Rotimi, C. N., Kaufman, J. S., Owoaje, E. E., Fraser, H., Forrester, T., Wilks, R., Riste, L. K., & Cruickshank, J. K.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1997-03-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 343-348
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2060882666
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of NIDDM Among Populations of the African Diaspora. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.20.3.343
- The paper
- Cooper, R. S., Rotimi, C. N., Kaufman, J. S., Owoaje, E. E., Fraser, H., Forrester, T., Wilks, R., Riste, L. K., & Cruickshank, J. K. (1997). Prevalence of NIDDM Among Populations of the African Diaspora. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.20.3.343
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.