The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Stratton, I. M. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7258.405 · Cited by 9,059
Katz, A., Nambi, S. S., Mather, K., Baron, A. D., Follmann, D. A., Sullivan, G., & Quon, M. J. (2000) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem.85.7.6661 · Cited by 3,931
Elevated C-reactive protein levels in overweight and obese adults
Visser, M. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.22.2131 · Cited by 2,494
Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: association of insulin resistance and mitochondrial abnormalities
Sanyal, A. J., Campbell–Sargent, C., Mirshahi, F., Rizzo, W. B., Contos, M. J., Sterling, R. K., Luketic, V. A., Shiffman, M. L., & Clore, J. N. (2001) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/gast.2001.23256 · Cited by 2,078
Legro, R. S. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.84.1.165 · Cited by 1,743
Metadata
- Authors
- The Expert Committee On The Diagnosis And Classification Of Diabetes Mellitus
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1998-01-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- Supplement_1
- Pages
- S5-S19
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W4248142985
- Cited by
- 897
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 35.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.21.1.s5
- The paper
- The Expert Committee On The Diagnosis And Classification Of Diabetes Mellitus. (1998). Report of the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.21.1.s5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
