The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Supporting Autonomy to Motivate Patients With Diabetes for Glucose Control
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We applied the self-determination theory of human motivation to examine whether patient perceptions of autonomy supportiveness (i.e., patient centeredness) from their diabetes care providers related to improved glucose control over a 12-month period. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of patients with diabetes from a diabetes treatment center at a university-affiliated community hospital. Participants were 128 patients between 18 and 80 years of age who took medication for diabetes, had no other major medical illnesses, and were responsible for monitoring their glucose and taking their medications. The main outcome measure was a change in HbA1c values over the 12 months of the study. RESULTS: Patient perception of autonomy support from a health care provider related to a change in HbA1c values at 12 months (P < 0.05). Further analyses showed that perceived autonomy support from the staff related to significant increases in patient autonomous motivation at 12 months (P < 0.05); that increases in autonomous motivation related to significant increases in perceived competence (P < 0.05); and that increases in a patient's perceived competence related to significant reductions in their HbA1c values over 12 months (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The findings support the prediction of the self-determination theory that patients with diabetes whose health care providers are autonomy supportive will become more motivated to regulate their glucose levels, feel more able to regulate their glucose, and show improvements in their HbA1c values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Need for a New Medical Model: A Challenge for Biomedicine
Engel, G. L. (1977) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.847460 · Cited by 12,887
Further Examining the American Dream: Differential Correlates of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Goals
Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1996) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167296223006 · Cited by 2,745
Enhancing motivation for change in problem drinking: a controlled comparison of two therapist styles
Miller, W. R., Benefield, R. G., & Tonigan, J. S. (1993) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.61.3.455 · Cited by 566
Smith, D. E., Heckemeyer, C. M., Kratt, P. P., & Mason, D. A. (1997) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.20.1.52 · Cited by 359
Cited by
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68 · Cited by 54,599
Self-citationThe "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210
Self-citationSocial support and patient adherence to medical treatment: a meta-analysis.
DiMatteo, M. R. (2004) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.23.2.207 · Cited by 2,107
Living well: A self-determination theory perspective on eudaimonia
Ryan, R. M., Huta, V., & Deci, E. L. (2008) · Journal of Happiness Studies · doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9023-4 · Cited by 1,752
Self-citationThe role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement
Gagné, M. (2003) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1023/a:1025007614869 · Cited by 1,397
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, G. C., Freedman, Z. R., & Deci, E. L.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1998-10-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1644-1651
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2006893169
- Cited by
- 1,134
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 8.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Supporting Autonomy to Motivate Patients With Diabetes for Glucose Control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.21.10.1644
- The paper
- Williams, G. C., Freedman, Z. R., & Deci, E. L. (1998). Supporting Autonomy to Motivate Patients With Diabetes for Glucose Control. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.21.10.1644
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.