The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Transcutaneous oxygen tension and toe blood pressure as predictors for outcome of diabetic foot ulcers.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The present study was undertaken to compare the predictive values of transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcPO2) and toe blood pressure (TBP) measurements for ulcer healing in patients with diabetes and chronic foot ulcers. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Investigated prospectively were 50 diabetic patients (37 men) with chronic foot ulcers. The age was 61 +/- 12 (mean +/- SD), and the diabetes duration was 26 +/- 14 years. TBP (mmHg) was measured in dig I and TcPO2 (mmHg) at the dorsum of the foot. Ulcer healing was continuously evaluated by measuring the ulcer area every 4-6 weeks. After a follow-up time of 12 months, the patients were divided into three groups according to clinical outcome: healed with intact skin, improved ulcer healing, or impaired ulcer healing. RESULTS: Of the 13 patients who deteriorated, 11 had TcPO2 < 25 mmHg, while 34 of the 37 patients who improved had TcPO2 > or = 25 mmHg. The sensitivity and specificity for TcPO2 were 85 and 92%, respectively, when a cutoff level of 25 mmHg was used for determination of outcome of ulcer healing (healing or nonhealing). The corresponding values for TBP at 30 mmHg were 15 and 97%. Measurement of TcPO2 provided a higher positive predictive value (79%) than TBP (67%). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that TcPO2 is a better predictor for ulcer healing than TBP in diabetic patients with chronic foot ulcers, and that the probability of ulcer healing is low when TcPO2 is < 25 mmHg.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mills, J. L., Conte, M. S., Armstrong, D. G., Pomposelli, F. B., Schanzer, A., Sidawy, A. N., & Andros, G. (2014) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2013.08.003 · Cited by 1,718
Fitridge, R., Chuter, V., Mills, J., Hinchliffe, R., Azuma, N., Behrendt, C., Boyko, E. J., Conte, M. S., Humphries, M., Kirksey, L., et al. (2024) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.3686 · Cited by 201
A systematic review and meta-analysis of tests to predict wound healing in diabetic foot.
Wang, Z., Hasan, R., Firwana, B., Elraiyah, T., Tsapas, A., Prokop, L., Mills, J. L., & Murad, M. H. (2016) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2015.10.004 · Cited by 173
Brownrigg, J. R. W., Hinchliffe, R. J., Apelqvist, J., Boyko, E. J., Fitridge, R., Mills, J. L., Reekers, J., Shearman, C. P., Zierler, R. E., Schaper, N. C., et al. (2016) · Diabetes/Metabolism Research and Reviews · doi:10.1002/dmrr.2704 · Cited by 130
Embil, J. M., Albalawi, Z., Bowering, K., & Trepman, E. (2018) · Canadian Journal of Diabetes · doi:10.1016/j.jcjd.2017.10.020 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Kalani, M., Brismar, K., Fagrell, B., Ostergren, J., & Jörneskog, G.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 1999-01-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 147-151
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W1970646241
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transcutaneous oxygen tension and toe blood pressure as predictors for outcome of diabetic foot ulcers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.22.1.147
- The paper
- Kalani, M., Brismar, K., Fagrell, B., Ostergren, J., & Jörneskog, G. (1999). Transcutaneous oxygen tension and toe blood pressure as predictors for outcome of diabetic foot ulcers. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.22.1.147
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.