CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 385Smoking Behavior and CessationDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Smoking and diabetes

Haire-Joshu, D, Glasgow, R E, Tibbs, T L·1999·Diabetes Care
DOI 10.2337/diacare.22.11.1887
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The objective of this review is to summarize the literature on diabetes and smoking related to epidemiological risks, efficacy and cost-effectiveness of different cessation approaches, and implications for clinical practice. Over 200 studies were reviewed, with special emphasis placed on publications within the past 10 years. Intervention studies that included patients with diabetes but did not report results separately by disease are included. Diabetes-specific studies are highlighted. There are consistent results from both cross-sectional and prospective studies showing enhanced risk for micro- and macrovascular disease, as well as premature mortality from the combination of smoking and diabetes. The general cessation literature is extensive, generally well-designed, and encouraging regarding the impact of cost-effective practical office-based interventions. In particular, system-based approaches that make smoking a routine part of office contacts and provide multiple prompts, advice, assistance, and follow-up support are effective. Although there is minimal information on the effectiveness of cessation interventions specifically for people with diabetes, there is no reason to assume that cessation intervention would be more or less effective in this population. There is a clear need to increase the frequency of smoking cessation advice and counseling for patients with diabetes given the strong and consistent data on smoking prevalence; combined risks of smoking and diabetes for morbidity, mortality, and several complications; and the proven efficacy and cost-effectiveness of cessation strategies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.22.11.1887

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–385 of 385

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Haire-Joshu, D., Glasgow, R. E., & Tibbs, T. L.
Affiliations
Saint Louis University (US)
ORCID
Haire-Joshu, D
Venue
Diabetes Care
Publisher
American Diabetes Association
Published
1999-11-01
Volume
22
Issue
11
Pages
1887-1898
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
DOI
10.2337/diacare.22.11.1887
OpenAlex
W2097373134
Cited by
381
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 16
FWCI
7.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
smoking, diabetes mellitus, smoking cessation, diabetes complications, microangiopathy, macroangiopathy, premature mortality, cost-effectiveness, cessation interventions, smoking cessation counseling
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetic Angiopathies, Health Policy, Humans, Risk Factors, Smoking, Prevalence, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review