Cited by 224Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes and associated disorders

Efficacy and safety of HOE 901 versus NPH insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes. The European Study Group of HOE 901 in type 1 diabetes.

Open access
Pieber, T R, Eugène-Jolchine, I, Derobert, E·2000·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: HOE 901 (Hoechst Marion Roussel, Frankfurt, Germany) is a biosynthetic insulin with a prolonged action. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of the long-acting insulin analog HOE 901 with NPH insulin regarding glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 333 type 1 diabetic patients were enrolled in this multinational parallel group trial. Subjects were randomized either to two different formulations of HOE 901 (the formulations differed only in zinc content) or to NPH insulin. The study was only partially blinded because patients can distinguish HOE 901 (a clear solution) from NPH (a cloudy suspension). In addition to premeal injections of regular insulin, patients received HOE 901 at bedtime or NPH once daily at bedtime or twice daily in the morning and at bedtime. RESULTS: Fasting plasma glucose levels were significantly lower with HOE 901 (-1.88 mmol/l. P = 0.0005) as were fasting self-monitored blood glucose levels (-0.80 mmol/l, P = 0.0020). HbA1c levels also showed a significant reduction with HOE 901 (-0.14%) versus NPH (P = 0.030). The overall frequency of hypoglycemia did not differ, but the frequency of nocturnal hypoglycemia was significantly (P = 0.0037) lower with HOE 901 (36 vs. 55%). However, this effect on nocturnal hypoglycemia was significant only versus NPH once daily not NPH twice daily. The pattern of adverse events and injection site reactions with HOE 901 was similar to that with NPH. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that HOE 901 achieves better control of fasting glucose and HbA1c levels over 4 weeks, and HOE 901 has a possible safety benefit in terms of nocturnal hypoglycemia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.23.2.157

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The first long-acting once-daily basal insulin, glargine, was approved in 2000; it was designed to have an extended duration of action through amino acid modifications in both chains.

    “The first long-acting once-daily basal insulin, glargine, was approved in 2000 (ref. 117). It was designed to have an extended duration of action through amino acid modifications in both chains (A chain A21 asparagine substituted by glycine and B chain elongated by adding two arginines).”

    From 100 years of insulin: celebrating the past, present and future of diabetes therapy (2021) · cites this paper as [117]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pieber, T. R., Eugène-Jolchine, I., & Derobert, E.
Affiliations
University of Graz (AT)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2000-02-01
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
157-162
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W1989775174
Cited by
224
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
16.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
long-acting insulin analogues, NPH insulin, type 1 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, nocturnal hypoglycemia, hypoglycemia, zinc content, insulin formulations, adverse events, injection site reactions
MeSH terms
Insulin Glargine, Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Insulin, Insulin, Isophane, Male, Middle Aged, Safety, Single-Blind Method, Fructosamine, Insulin, Long-Acting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review