The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Use of insulin aspart, a fast-acting insulin analog, as the mealtime insulin in the management of patients with type 1 diabetes.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare long-term glycemic control and safety of using insulin aspart (IAsp) with that of regular human insulin (HI). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a multicenter randomized open-label 6-month study (882 subjects) with a 6-month extension period (714 subjects) that enrolled subjects with type 1 diabetes. Subjects administered IAsp immediately before meals or regular HI 30 min before meals; basal NPH insulin was taken as a single bedtime dose in the majority of subjects. Glycemic control was assessed with HbA1c values and 8-point blood glucose profiles at 3-month intervals. RESULTS: Mean postprandial blood glucose levels (mg/dl +/- SEM) were significantly lower for subjects in the IAsp group compared with subjects in the HI group after breakfast (156 +/- 3.4 vs. 185 +/- 4.7), lunch (137 +/- 3.1 vs. 162 +/- 4.1), and dinner (153 +/- 3.1 vs. 168 +/- 4.1), when assessed after 6 months of treatment. Mean HbA1c values (% +/- SEM) were slightly, but significantly, lower for the IAsp group (7.78% +/- 0.03) than for the regular HI group (7.93% +/- 0.05, P = 0.005) at 6 months. Similar postprandial blood glucose and HbA1c values were observed at 12 months. Adverse events and overall hypoglycemic episodes were similar for both treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Postprandial glycemic control was significantly better with IAsp compared with HI after 6 and 12 months of treatment. The improvement was not obtained at an increased risk of hypoglycemia. HbA1c was slightly, but significantly, lower for IAsp compared with HI at 6 and 12 months.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mudaliar, S. R., Lindberg, F. A., Joyce, M., Beerdsen, P., Strange, P., Lin, A., & Henry, R. R. (1999) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.22.9.1501 · Cited by 276
Cited by
Management of diabetes and hyperglycemia in hospitals.
Clement, S., Braithwaite, S. S., Magee, M. F., Ahmann, A., Smith, E. P., Schafer, R. G., Hirsch, I. B., & on behalf of the Diabetes in Hospitals Writing Committee (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.2.553 · Cited by 1,266
Emerging micro- and nanotechnology based synthetic approaches for insulin delivery
Mo, R., Jiang, T., Di, J., Tai, W., & Gu, Z. (2014) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c3cs60436e · Cited by 386
Owens, D. R., Zinman, B., & Bolli, G. B. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05842-1 · Cited by 373
Hermansen, K., Fontaine, P., Kukolja, K. K., Peterkova, V., Leth, G., & Gall, M.-A. (2004) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-004-1365-z · Cited by 365
Maternal Glycemic Control and Hypoglycemia in Type 1 Diabetic Pregnancy
Mathiesen, E. R., Kinsley, B., Amiel, S. A., Heller, S., McCance, D., Duran, S., Bellaire, S., Raben, A., & on behalf of the Insulin Aspart Pregnancy Study Group (2007) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc06-1887 · Cited by 265
Metadata
- Authors
- Raskin, P., Guthrie, R. A., Leiter, L., Riis, A., & Jovanovic, L.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2000-05-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 583-588
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2104888919
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Use of insulin aspart, a fast-acting insulin analog, as the mealtime insulin in the management of patients with type 1 diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.23.5.583
- The paper
- Raskin, P., Guthrie, R. A., Leiter, L., Riis, A., & Jovanovic, L. (2000). Use of insulin aspart, a fast-acting insulin analog, as the mealtime insulin in the management of patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.23.5.583
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.