Cited by 180Gestational Diabetes Research and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Glycemic Plus Fetal Ultrasound Parameters Versus Glycemic Parameters to Determine Insulin Therapy in Gestational Diabetes With Fasting Hyperglycemia

Open access
Kjos, Siri L., Schaefer-Graf, Ute, Sardesi, Smeeta, Peters, Ruth K., Buley, Ann, Xiang, Anny H., Bryne, James D., Sutherland, Cher +2 more·2001·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—To compare management based on maternal glycemic criteria with management based on relaxed glycemic criteria and fetal abdominal circumference (AC) measurements in order to select patients for insulin treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) with fasting hyperglycemia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—In a pilot study, 98 women with fasting plasma glucose (FPG) concentrations of 105–120 mg/dl were randomized. The standard group received insulin treatment. The experimental group received insulin if the AC, measured monthly, was ≥70th percentile and/or if any venous FPG measurement was >120 mg/dl. Power was projected to detect a 250-g difference in birth weights. RESULTS—Gestational ages, maternal glycemia, and AC percentiles were similar at randomization. After initiation of protocol, venous FPG (P = 0.003) and capillary blood glucose levels (P = 0.049) were significantly lower in the standard group. Birth weights (3,271 ± 458 vs. 3,369 ± 461 g), frequencies of birth weights >90th percentile (6.3 vs 8.3%), and neonatal morbidity (25 vs. 25%) did not differ significantly between the standard and experimental groups, respectively. The cesarean delivery rate was significantly lower (14.6 vs. 33.3%, P = 0.03) in the standard group; this difference was not explained by birth weights. In the experimental group, infants of women who did not receive insulin had lower birth weights than infants of mothers treated with insulin (3,180 ± 425 vs. 3,482 ± 451 g, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS—In women with GDM and fasting hyperglycemia, glucose plus fetal AC measurements identified pregnancies at low risk for macrosomia and resulted in the avoidance of insulin therapy in 38% of patients without increasing rates of neonatal morbidity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.24.11.1904

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are some data to suggest that increased fetal abdominal circumference, as detected on ultrasound, may be used to help determine whether insulin should be introduced in women with gestational diabetes.

    “There are some data to suggest that increased fetal abdominal circumference, as detected on ultrasound, may be used to help determine whether insulin should be introduced in women with gestational diabetes (112, 113).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kjos, S. L., Schaefer-Graf, U., Sardesi, S., Peters, R. K., Buley, A., Xiang, A. H., Bryne, J. D., Sutherland, C., Montoro, M. N., & Buchanan, T. A.
Affiliations
University of Southern California (US)
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2001-11-01
Volume
24
Issue
11
Pages
1904-1910
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2069748491
Cited by
180
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, fasting hyperglycemia, insulin therapy, fetal abdominal circumference, macrosomia, birth weight, neonatal morbidity, cesarean section, capillary blood glucose
MeSH terms
Adult, Anthropometry, Birth Weight, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Fasting, Female, Gestational Age, Glucose Tolerance Test, Humans, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Newborn, Diseases, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Insulin, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Male, Obesity, Parity, Patient Education as Topic, Pilot Projects, Pregnancy, Skinfold Thickness, Body Mass Index, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Diabetes, Gestational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review