Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 542

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Population-Based Study of Diabetes and Risk Characteristics in Turkey

Open access
Satman, Ilhan, Yilmaz, Temel, Sengül, Ahmet, Salman, Serpil, Salman, Fatih, Uygur, Sevil, Bastar, Irfan, Tütüncü, Yildiz, Sargin, Mehmet, Dinççag, Nevin, Karsidag, Kubilay, Kalaça, Sibel, Özcan, Cihangir, King, Hilary, The TURDEP Group·2002·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVES—To investigate for the first time the prevalence of diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) nationwide in Turkey; to assess regional variations and relationships between glucose intolerance and lifestyle and physical risk factors. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—The Turkish Diabetes Epidemiology Study (TURDEP) is a cross-sectional, population-based survey that included 24,788 subjects (age ≥20 years, women 55%, response 85%). Glucose tolerance was classified according to World Health Organization recommendations on the basis of 2-h blood glucose values. RESULTS—Crude prevalence of diabetes was 7.2% (previously undiagnosed, 2.3%) and of IGT, 6.7% (age-standardized to world and European populations, 7.9 and 7.0%). Both were more frequent in women than men (P < 0.0001) and in those living in urban rather than rural communities (P < 0.001). Prevalence rates of hypertension and obesity were 29 and 22%, respectively. Both were more common among women than men (P < 0.0001). Prevalence of diabetes and IGT increased with rising BMI, waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and waist girth (P < 0.0001). Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that age, BMI, WHR, familial diabetes, and hypertension were independently associated with diabetes, age, BMI, WHR, familial diabetes, and hypertension with IGT (except for familial diabetes in women with IGT). Education was related to diabetes in men but was protective for diabetes and IGT in women. Socioeconomic status appeared to decrease the risk of IGT in men while it increased the risk in women. Smoking had a protective effect for IGT in both sexes. CONCLUSIONS—Diabetes and IGT are moderately common in Turkey by international standards. Associations with obesity and hypertension have been confirmed. Other lifestyle factors had a variable relationship with glucose tolerance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.25.9.1551

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 542

Metadata

Authors
Satman, I., Yilmaz, T., Sengül, A., Salman, S., Salman, F., Uygur, S., Bastar, I., Tütüncü, Y., Sargin, M., Dinççag, N., Karsidag, K., Kalaça, S., Özcan, C., King, H., & The TURDEP Group
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2002-09-01
Volume
25
Issue
9
Pages
1551-1556
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2164229584
Cited by
542
References
2
FWCI
6.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Population-Based Study of Diabetes and Risk Characteristics in Turkey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2337/diacare.25.9.1551
The paper
Satman, I., Yilmaz, T., Sengül, A., Salman, S., Salman, F., Uygur, S., Bastar, I., Tütüncü, Y., Sargin, M., Dinççag, N., Karsidag, K., Kalaça, S., Özcan, C., King, H., & The TURDEP Group. (2002). Population-Based Study of Diabetes and Risk Characteristics in Turkey. Diabetes Care. https://doi.org/10.2337/diacare.25.9.1551

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.