Impact of Bedtime Snack Composition on Prevention of Nocturnal Hypoglycemia in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Undergoing Intensive Insulin Management Using Lispro Insulin Before Meals
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE—To determine the impact of four bedtime (HS) snack compositions on nocturnal glycemic control, including frequency of hypoglycemia (<4 mmol/l) and morning hyperglycemia (>10 mmol/l), in adults with type 1 diabetes using lispro insulin before meals and NPH insulin at bedtime. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—Substitutions of 15 g carbohydrate (one starch exchange) for an equivalent amount of uncooked cornstarch or pure protein were compared to a standard snack (control: two starch + one protein exchange) and to no snack (placebo) in 15 adults using a randomized, cross-over design. All snacks were equivalent in kcal, fat, and total available glucose. An intravenous facilitated hourly blood glucose sampling during the night (11:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.). RESULTS—The glycemic level at bedtime (<7, 7–10, and >10 mmol/l) mediated the effects observed. A total of 14 hypoglycemic episodes, in 60% of patients, and 23 morning hyperglycemic episodes occurred over 50 nights. Most hypoglycemic episodes (10 of 14, 71%) occurred with no snack compared to any snack (P < 0.001) and at HS levels of <7 mmol/l (P = 0.05). The standard and protein snacks resulted in no nocturnal hypoglycemia at all HS glucose levels (P < 0.001). Only HS glucose >10 mmol/l was protective against hypoglycemia, even in the absence of a snack (P = 0.05); 46% of morning hyperglycemic episodes were associated (r = 0.37, P = 0.07) with this HS glucose level. CONCLUSIONS—The need for and composition of an HS snack depends on the HS glucose such that no snack is necessary at levels >10 mmol/l. At levels between 7 and 10 mmol/l, any snack is advised, and at <7 mmol/l, a standard or protein snack is recommended.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The best bedtime snack to prevent overnight hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes has been investigated without clear consensus.
“The best bedtime snack to prevent overnight hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes has been investigated without clear consensus (108–112).”
From Hypoglycemia and Diabetes: A Report of a Workgroup of the American Diabetes Association and The Endocrine Society (2013) · cites this paper as [109]
Nocturnal hypoglycemia is a concern for T1DM patients, particularly when bedtime glucose concentrations are ≤180 mg/dL (≤10 mmol/L).
“Similar to those with Type 1 GSD, nocturnal hypoglycemia is also a concern for T1DM patients, particularly when bedtime glucose concentrations are ≤180 mg/dL (≤10 mmol/L) [54].”
From The Health Impact of Nighttime Eating: Old and New Perspectives (2015) · cites this paper as [54]
Bedtime feedings of cornstarch and/or protein have been useful in reducing hypoglycemic occurrences in populations with T1DM.
“Likewise, bedtime feedings of cornstarch and/or protein have been useful in reducing hypoglycemic occurrences in populations with T1DM [54,68,69,70].”
From The Health Impact of Nighttime Eating: Old and New Perspectives (2015) · cites this paper as [54]
In patients with T1DM, the incidence of next morning hyperglycemia in response to nighttime snacks was greatest for the protein snack (33%), followed by the standard (29%) and cornstarch snack (29%), with the no snack treatment being the lowest (8%), although not significant.
“However, although not significant, the incidence of next morning hyperglycemia in response to these nighttime snacks was greatest for the protein snack (33%), followed by the standard (29%) and cornstarch snack (29%), with the no snack treatment being the lowest (8%).”
From The Health Impact of Nighttime Eating: Old and New Perspectives (2015) · cites this paper as [54]
In patients with T1DM undergoing intensive insulin management, both standard and protein-rich bedtime snacks were most successful at preventing nocturnal hypoglycemia, while the no snack treatment had the greatest hypoglycemic episodes.
“In this study, both the standard and protein-rich snacks were most successful at preventing nocturnal hypoglycemia while the no snack treatment had the greatest hypoglycemic episodes.”
From The Health Impact of Nighttime Eating: Old and New Perspectives (2015) · cites this paper as [54]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 82
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [38]38. Sherwin RS, Felig P: Effect of glucagon on amino acid metabolism and gluconeogen- esis. In Glucagon: Physiology, Pathophysiol- ogy, Morphology of Pancreatic A-Cells. New York, Elsevier, 1981, p. 256 -271
- Authors
- Kalergis, M., Schiffrin, A., Gougeon, R., Jones, P. J. H., & Yale, J.-F.
- Affiliations
- McGill University Health Centre (CA)
- Jewish General Hospital (CA)
- McGill Nutrition Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital, MUHC, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- McGill University (CA)
- ORCID
- Jones, Peter J.H.
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2003-01-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-15
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W1965272288
- Cited by
- 82
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Keywords
- bedtime snack, nocturnal hypoglycemia, type 1 diabetes, insulin lispro, NPH insulin, carbohydrate substitution
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Proteins, Eating, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies, Insulin Lispro
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review