CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 313Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCancer, Lipids, and Metabolism

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Events With Long-Term Pravastatin in Patients With Diabetes or Impaired Fasting Glucose

Open access
Keech, Anthony, Colquhoun, David, Best, James, Kirby, Adrienne, Simes, R. John, Hunt, David, Hague, Wendy, Beller, Elaine, Arulchelvam, Manjula, Baker, Jennifer, Tonkin, Andrew, for the LIPID Study Group·2003·Diabetes Care
DOI 10.2337/diacare.26.10.2713
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

OBJECTIVE—Diabetes, a major health problem worldwide, increases the risk of cardiovascular disease and its associated mortality. Evidence of the overall benefits of lipid modification in this area is needed. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) trial showed that cholesterol-lowering treatment with pravastatin reduced mortality and coronary heart disease (CHD) events in 9,014 patients aged 31–75 years with CHD and total cholesterol 4.0–7.0 mmol/l. We measured the effects of pravastatin therapy, 40 mg/day over 6.0 years, on the risk of CHD death or nonfatal myocardial infarction and other cardiovascular outcomes in 1,077 LIPID patients with diabetes and 940 patients with impaired fasting glucose (IFG). RESULTS—In patients allocated to placebo, the risk of a major CHD event was 61% higher in patients with diabetes and 23% higher in the IFG group than in patients with normal fasting glucose, and the risk of any cardiovascular event was 37% higher in the diabetic group and 19% higher in the IFG group. Pravastatin therapy reduced the risk of a major CHD event overall from 15.9 to 12.3% (relative risk reduction [RRR] 24%, P < 0.001) and from 23.4 to 19.6% in the diabetic group (19%, P = 0.11); in the diabetic group, the reduction was not significantly different from the reductions in the other groups. Pravastatin reduced the risk of any cardiovascular event from 52.7 to 45.2% (21%, P < 0.008) in patients with diabetes and from 45.7 to 37.1% (26%, P = 0.003) in the IFG group. Pravastatin reduced the risk of stroke from 9.9 to 6.3% in the diabetic group (RRR 39%, CI 7–61%, P = 0.02) and from 5.4 to 3.4% in the IFG group (RRR 42%, CI −9 to 69%, P = 0.09). Pravastatin did not reduce the incidence of diabetes. Over 6 years, pravastatin therapy prevented one major CHD event (CHD death or nonfatal myocardial infarction) in 23 patients with IFG and 18 patients with diabetes. A meta-analysis of other major trials confirmed the high absolute risks of diabetes and IFG and the absolute benefits of statin therapy in these patients. CONCLUSIONS—Cholesterol-lowering treatment with pravastatin therapy prevents cardiovascular events, including stroke, in patients with diabetes or IFG and established CHD.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/diacare.26.10.2713

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 313

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Keech, A., Colquhoun, D., Best, J., Kirby, A., Simes, R. J., Hunt, D., Hague, W., Beller, E., Arulchelvam, M., Baker, J., Tonkin, A., & for the LIPID Study Group
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Wesley Hospital (AU)
  • St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne (AU)
  • The Royal Melbourne Hospital (AU)
  • National Heart Foundation of Australia (AU)
ORCID
Venue
Diabetes Care
Publisher
American Diabetes Association
Published
2003-10-01
Volume
26
Issue
10
Pages
2713-2721
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
DOI
10.2337/diacare.26.10.2713
OpenAlex
W2086139919
Cited by
313
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 14
FWCI
26.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Bristol-Myers Squibb
  • National Heart Foundation of Australia
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Keywords
pravastatin, secondary prevention, cardiovascular events, diabetes mellitus, impaired fasting glucose, coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction, stroke, LIPID trial, cholesterol-lowering therapy, statins, cardiovascular risk reduction, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes incidence, nonfatal myocardial infarction, cardiovascular hospitalization
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Angina, Unstable, Anticholesteremic Agents, Blood Glucose, Cardiovascular Diseases, Coronary Artery Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Fasting, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hyperlipidemias, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome, Pravastatin, Glucose Intolerance, Stroke, Coronary Restenosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review