Insulin Detemir Is Characterized by a Consistent Pharmacokinetic Profile Across Age-Groups in Children, Adolescents, and Adults With Type 1 Diabetes
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE—This trial aimed to characterize for the first time the pharmacokinetic profile of insulin detemir, the novel soluble basal insulin analog, in children and adolescents compared with adults. Comparisons were also made with NPH insulin to determine any between-treatment difference in the effect of age on pharmacokinetic profile. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—This single-center, open-label, randomized, crossover trial included children (aged 6–12 years, n = 13), adolescents (aged 13–17 years, n = 10), and adults (aged 18–65 years, n = 11) of both sexes. Subjects were given single doses of 0.5 units/kg s.c. insulin detemir or 0.5 IU/kg NPH insulin on 2 separate days. Serial blood sampling was performed for 24 h for analysis of serum insulin detemir, human insulin, and glucose concentrations. RESULTS—The mean pharmacokinetic profile of insulin detemir was similar across all three age-groups. This was determined by statistical analyses of the data, which showed no overall age effect or between-group differences when pairwise comparisons were made between children (or adolescents) and adults on the parameters of the area under the curve (AUC), AUC from zero to infinity, AUC from 0 to 24 h [AUC(0–24 h)], and the maximum concentration measured during the 24 h after closing. No overall age effect for AUC(0–24 h) and Cmax was detected for NPH insulin, but data were only analyzable from seven adults and pairwise comparisons did indicate that children and adults had different pharmacokinetic profiles. Less total variability in the pharmacokinetics of insulin detemir than NPH insulin was indicated by lower coefficients of variation in AUC, Cmax, and time to maximum concentration in all three age-groups. CONCLUSIONS—The data suggest that insulin detemir can be used in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes using titration guidelines similar to those used in adults. Moreover, insulin detemir may offer the advantage of greater predictability of response in comparison to NPH insulin due to lower total variability and a lesser degree of kinetic disparity across age-groups.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous investigations with another basal analogue have shown that pharmacological exposure can be higher in children and adolescents than in adults.
“Previous investigations with another basal analogue have shown that the pharmacological exposure can be higher in children and adolescents than in adults [39].”
From A Review of the Pharmacological Properties of Insulin Degludec and Their Clinical Relevance (2014) · cites this paper as [39]
Cites
Lepore, M., Pampanelli, S., Fanelli, C., Porcellati, F., Bartocci, L., Di Vincenzo, A., Cordoni, C., Costa, E., Brunetti, P., & Bolli, G. B. (2000) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diabetes.49.12.2142 · Cited by 818 · see citing works
Vague, P., Selam, J.-L., Skeie, S., De Leeuw, I., Elte, J. W. F., Haahr, H., Kristensen, A., & Draeger, E. (2003) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.26.3.590 · Cited by 294 · see citing works
Beregszàszi, M., Tubiana-Rufi, N., Benali, K., Noël, M., Bloch, J., & Czernichow, P. (1997) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70121-5 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Porter, P. A., Byrne, G., Stick, S., & Jones, T. W. (1996) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.75.2.120 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Variability of Insulin Absorption and Insulin Action
Heinemann, L. (2002) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/152091502320798312 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
A Review of the Pharmacological Properties of Insulin Degludec and Their Clinical Relevance
Haahr, H., & Heise, T. (2014) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.1007/s40262-014-0165-y · Cited by 226 · see citing works
“Previous investigations with another basal analogue have shown that the pharmacological exposure can be higher in children and adolescents than in adults [39].”
Background
- Authors
- Danne, T., Lüpke, K., Walte, K., von Schuetz, W., & Gall, M.-A.
- Affiliations
- Kinderkrankenhaus auf der Bult (DE)
- Kinderkrankenhaus auf der Bult, Hannover, Germany
- Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2003-11-01
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 3087-3092
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2063822715
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 6.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Novo Nordisk
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
- Keywords
- insulin detemir, pharmacokinetics, type 1 diabetes, age differences, children and adolescents, NPH insulin, basal insulin analogues, insulin dose, pharmacokinetic variability, insulin dose adjustment
- MeSH terms
- Insulin Detemir, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Carrier Proteins, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin, Isophane, Male, Middle Aged, Cross-Over Studies, Insulin, Long-Acting
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review